Skip to main content

AI Core

  1. unipat.ai

    Can AI agents predict wet-lab results? SPU scores 100 public and 16 unpublished experiments, and the best configuration beats chance on only about half its tasks

    Science Prediction Universe (SPU) places AI agents in a real wet-lab prediction setting: given only experimental conditions and candidates, an agent has eight hours to search the literature, run calculations and rank candidates, which are then scored against measurements by Spearman correlation. The 100 public tasks come from recent Nature Portfolio papers and the 16 private tasks from unpublished experiments, so retrieval cannot help. The best of thirteen frontier-model configurations beats chance on only about half its scored tasks, and more reasoning effort or more tool families brought no detectable score gain.

  2. Spectral bias lives in the training kernel, not the wavenumber basis: dense operator learners spread error almost evenly across modes

    Training five operator models on the one-dimensional discrete Poisson problem shows that error is not learned wavenumber by wavenumber but is retained along small-eigenvalue directions of the kernel that governs the training update. Sine-aligned spectral and linear Fourier neural operators give each wavenumber its own rate, so error collects at high wavenumbers; dense networks have eigendirections close to random in the sine basis, so error is nearly equal at every wavenumber and relative error grows only because the true solution spectrum decays. Removing the minibatch cross terms leaves the GELU dense network with under 0.1% of squared error below ηλ≈8×10⁻⁵ under either forcing.

  3. Retail media ads stop counting clicks alone: theory-anchored semi-Markov states lift one-step purchase AUC from 0.635 to 0.717

    Retail media networks usually compress clickstreams into click-through, conversion, recency and similar summaries, so two shoppers with identical event counts become indistinguishable. Across three campaign waves on an anonymized omni-channel retailer's platform covering 5.2 million active members, purchase-intention inference is framed as theory-coherent hidden semi-Markov dynamics: states are declared by the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Consumer Decision Journey and the Persuasion Knowledge Model, a retrieval-augmented language model supplies a reference posterior, and a KL regularizer in the expectation step stabilizes state assignment. On n=1,008 paired test consumers the model reaches one-step purchase AUC 0.717 against 0.635 for an action-only covariate baseline.

  4. Multimodal trackers stop correcting two streams in parallel: CCLT lets the second correction read the freshly updated state, training 0.212% of parameters

    RGB-X tracking pairs visible frames with thermal, depth or event data, but paired annotations are far scarcer than RGB pretraining data, so only a small set of parameters is usually tuned. Earlier bidirectional cross-modal corrections computed both directions side by side from uncorrected input states, so the second correction could not use the first one's result. CCLT inserts low-rank exchange modules at blocks 6 and 10 of a frozen backbone, letting one direction correct first and the other read the freshly corrected state; against a parameter-matched parallel version, mean LasHeR SR rises by 1.980 points (95% interval [0.360, 2.690]), with 196.6K trainable parameters, 0.212% of the 92.7M-parameter tracker.

  5. arXiv

    PixVid moves video generation back to pixels: one token per frame, camera control lands on the next frame

    PixVid converts a pretrained latent video diffusion model into a frame-wise pixel-space generator: it keeps the diffusion transformer, replaces the VAE decoder with a convolutional detailer head, and finetunes from Wan2.1-14B. It reaches VBench totals of 85.09 at 960p and 84.78 at 480p, above Wan2.1's 84.05 and PixelUMM's 83.72, and keeps 98% of source motion on fast clips versus 83% for an identically finetuned latent model.

  6. arXiv

    Diffusion language models learn when to rewrite: DiVR lifts a fine-tuned generator's five-benchmark average from 35.3% to 43.4%

    Masked diffusion language models can remask generated text, but deciding where to revise by confidence or self-judgment often leaves the error in place. DiVR instead learns an outcome verifier on the generator's own decodes and, at each block boundary, judges whether the partial solution can still reach a correct answer, resampling the whole block when the score is low. On the supervised fine-tuned LLaDA-8B-Base generator, the five-benchmark math and code average rises from 35.3% to 43.4% at the cost of greedy decoding.

  7. arXiv

    Meta-learned networks can add and subtract functions: recombined parameters implement a target function with no direct training

    Meta-learning, which exposes a network to many related functions so it can later learn similar ones quickly, leaves the adapted parameter vectors of that network in an additive geometric relationship. On the ABgeom sequence-generation task, randomly initialized transformers reached a mean F-score of 0.062 after five training batches, while meta-learned initializations reached 1.00 after one step; parameter vectors recombined by symbolic analogy produced networks that implemented the intended functions without direct training, at a mean F-score of 1.00 over 100 analogies. The effect appeared across transformers and LSTMs and three function domains, but the analogies hold only around a single initialization.

  8. arXiv

    Debate as a training protocol gets its first learning analysis: cooperating debaters can cut mistakes to a constant in some cases

    When debate is used as a training protocol, a human judges which of two debaters is right instead of supplying labels. Earlier work analyzed only the game between debaters under a known judge, leaving open how debaters learn the correct function. This work formulates debate as an online learning problem and shows there are cases where adversarial debate cannot learn but cooperative debate needs only a constant number of mistakes, with a new combinatorial dimension characterizing the optimal mistake bound for cooperative debaters in the realizable setting.

  9. arXiv

    A decision model that acts badly can still teach: JEV scores whole trajectories and lifts a 1.5B policy from 72.8% to 82.9%

    Decision models are usually judged by how well they act, yet the same models are pulled toward an easier subgoal when acting on ALFWorld. Used instead as a teacher that sees the whole trajectory after an episode and is asked whether each action helped, JEV raises a Qwen2.5-1.5B policy trained with GRPO from 72.8% to 82.9% success on ALFWorld and from 56.8% to 71.4% on WebShop, while JEV as an actor completes only 42.9% of ALFWorld tasks.

  10. arXiv

    Humanoid loco-manipulation drops full-body motion references: FORGE lifts boxes from wrist poses and coarse commands, hitting 90% success at 2 kg

    Humanoid whole-body manipulation usually needs full-body human motion trajectories or wrist force sensors. FORGE splits commands into four granularities, velocity navigation, planar footholds, wrist poses and an optional force command, trains without full-body human motion references, and at deployment consumes only pelvis-relative bilateral wrist poses and coarse commands. A momentum observer plus a learned correction estimates wrist-equivalent force from joint states and reconstructed PD torques, with no wrist force/torque sensor. In a squat-and-lift task across four payloads, one diffusion policy driving FORGE succeeded in all 20 trials empty and at 0.5 kg, and in 18 of 20 at 1 kg and 2 kg.