Skip to main content
Search

# Token Selection

6 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Offline RLVR stops supervising every token: GIST splits data by outcome and beats seven selectors on a shared pool

    Offline reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards usually supervises every token of every response in a fixed sampled pool, although responses and tokens are not equally informative. GIST splits the bidirectional KL mismatch between the policy and the Gibbs-optimal target of KL-regularized RLVR into a forward and a reverse term, then pairs correct and incorrect responses by sampling temperature and supervises only low-probability tokens of correct responses and high-probability tokens of incorrect ones. On Qwen3-0.6B/GSM8K with all methods choosing from the same candidates, it supervises 66.6% fewer tokens than training on all candidates and reaches 45.79 strict and 49.73 flexible accuracy, above seven selection baselines.

  2. arXiv

    JSSA makes token-level sparse decoding gather-free, reaching up to full-KV throughput at 128K context

    Long-context decoding is bottlenecked by repeatedly reading a growing KV cache, and sparse attention reads only part of it, yet token-level selection has not reliably delivered both accuracy and lower latency. JSSA scores candidate tokens in a shared low-dimensional query–key subspace and pairs it with a gather-free indexed-attention kernel that keeps a distinct selected token set for each KV head. Across GQA, hybrid sliding-window/global attention and MLA models it stays closest to full-KV accuracy, and on a B200 at 128K context its decoding throughput reaches up to that of full-KV attention.

  3. arXiv

    Recurrent memory splits each write into two calls: whether to store a token, then how many slots to touch, lifting sparse-fact accuracy from 0.048 to 0.222

    Recurrent-memory models compress history into a fixed set of slots, and earlier multi-slot memories wrote every token to the same number of slots, merging whether to store a token with how many slots to update. Factorized Write Routing separates the two: a learned gate first decides whether the current token is written, then a slot router chooses a fixed or token-adaptive number of slots, while queries still read all slots. Across ten seeds on two synthetic long-context tasks with four slots per write, the result reverses with information density: always writing reaches 0.472 long-context accuracy on dense Feature Recall versus 0.337 for the learned gate, while the learned gate reaches 0.222 on sparse-fact Passkey versus 0.048 for always writing.

  4. arXiv

    Multi-view 3D scenes no longer need every layer: GeoGR keeps over 95% performance at a tenth of the compute

    Multi-view 3D vision-language models split a scene into 32 views and produce more than six thousand visual tokens, making inference expensive. GeoGR compresses at two levels: at the projector it consolidates cross-view observations into voxel tokens selected by semantic saliency and spatial coverage, merging unselected voxel features into contextual anchors; inside the LLM it computes visual tokens only within a middle-layer window, letting low-relevance tokens skip whole layers with hidden states preserved and rejoin at anchor layers. On LLaVA-OneVision-7B and Video-3D LLM-7B it retains 95.2% and 96.8% of the dense models' performance, with clear LLM prefill and time-to-first-token speedups.

  5. arXiv

    Keeping only the top-attention tokens without retraining, nine checkpoints need effective attention sets of 7 to 283 tokens, and longer context raises the required set size

    Without retraining, this work retains only the tokens with the highest attention weights at each head, layer, and query while keeping their original weights unchanged, and estimates the effective attention set size needed to stay within a chosen loss tolerance by measuring the increase in negative log-likelihood (NLL); it finds that relatively small selected sets keep NLL close to the full-attention baseline, that attention-based selection substantially outperforms random selection, that the required set size grows with context while its fraction of context decreases, that in BABILong experiments with a fixed annotated supporting fact additional background pushes support tokens down the attention ranking and reduces their attention mass, and that renormalizing the retained weights can subs

  6. arXiv

    1% of Tokens Can Match Full Distillation: IER Re-ranks Sparse Supervision by Gradient-Estimation Reliability

    The work reframes token selection in on-policy distillation (OPD) as a gradient-estimation reliability problem at a fixed prefix, decomposes the one-sample reverse-KL gradient into signal and sampling noise in information geometry, proposes the information-efficiency ratio (IER) as a signal-to-noise ratio under the optimal scalar baseline, and approximates it on a top-K candidate set for ranking; on mathematical and medical reasoning, IER alone approaches or exceeds full OPD at token budgets of 0.1%–1%, and combined with existing usefulness scores (IER-OR, IER-AND) it matches or exceeds full OPD in multiple settings.

You’re all caught up