Skip to main content
Search

# Question Answering

9 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Different LLMs can now collaborate federatedly: FedVP pools locally trained verifiers instead of merging parameters

    Federated learning usually requires institutions to share one model backbone so parameter updates can be aggregated, which keeps centers running different model families or sizes from collaborating. FedVP moves collaboration from parameter aggregation to shared verification: each client trains a verifier on its local data and candidate responses from its own frozen LLM, and the server pools these independently trained verifiers to score and select answers, never merging backbone parameters. Across five medical question-answering datasets, with centers using Qwen and LLaMA backbones from 3B to 14B parameters, one verifier pool is reused for all five backbones without retraining and raises mean accuracy by 1.46 to 5.79 percentage points over the strongest conventional federated baselines.

  2. bioRxiv

    Guidelines move on, answers don't: with a strong model, retrieving several ASCO guideline versions made stale answers about four times as frequent as answering without retrieval

    Oncology guidelines are revised as evidence emerges, so an answer can faithfully cite a real guideline and still cite a superseded version. ASCOBench ties 288 questions to specific versions of ASCO breast and prostate cancer guidelines, with oncologist-reviewed reference answers; about one in four version-sensitive drafts needed revision or rewriting, against fewer than one in ten factual ones. Only 1 of 14 superseded guideline documents states that it has been replaced, and for the strong model Gemini retrieval over several guideline versions made stale answers about four times as frequent as answering without retrieval, while the verification-first SentryLine lowered incorrect answers to 4.2-5.2%.

  3. arXiv

    Geopolitical intelligence QA gets a public benchmark: 415 reports, 5,525 questions, retrieval solved but reasoning still hard

    Geopolitical intelligence QA now has a public benchmark of 415 reports and 5,525 question-answer pairs, where document-level retrieval is nearly saturated but even with gold evidence 70% of risk-oriented answers fall short.

  4. arXiv

    Multi-turn agents stop scoring whole trajectories: revisiting weak turns and resampling lifts aggregate exact match on seven QA benchmarks

    Multi-turn LLM agent training now ties exploration and credit assignment to one hindsight score: turns that lower the reference-answer likelihood are revisited and re-branched from the same parent, and inverse weights fold the outcomes back into the original policy, giving the highest aggregate exact match across seven QA benchmarks and three Qwen backbones.

  5. arXiv

    Splitting document QA into a searcher and a reader: same model gains 11.0 F1 on M3DocVQA

    Open-domain multimodal document QA requires first locating the right passages and then reading them, yet current retrieval-augmented agents give one model both kinds of tools and let it schedule itself. KnowForge separates the pipeline by job: a search-only Locator agent, a code-scheduled bridge judge that forces the missing second hop, a bounded evidence pool merging every search ranking, and a Deep Reader that only reads text, images and tables. With a self-hosted Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, it reaches F1 47.5 on the full M3DocVQA (2,441 questions, 3,368 PDFs), 11.0 above the published M3DocRAG and 7.1 above one-shot retrieve-and-answer on the same index and model.

  6. arXiv

    RAG-Stress diagnostic protocol: instructing models to prioritize documents makes them replace correct answers with evidence-supported foils, with Strict exceeding Soft by 10.9–13.5 percentage points

    RAG-Stress introduces a controlled diagnostic protocol that holds the question and reference answer fixed, edits one assertion so the evidence supports a designated incorrect answer, and crosses two source-priority policies with three positions of the answer span in the evidence text, measuring a misleading rate on questions each model answered correctly without retrieval across fifteen systems, three QA datasets, and English and Chinese medical QA. Instructions that prioritize documents consistently produce higher misleading rates than those permitting prior knowledge, with a mean gap of 10.9–13.5 percentage points across the three QA datasets, and model-averaged rates follow End, Beginning, Middle under both policies.

  7. arXiv

    RECAST trains a lightweight router to unify retrieval and computation as evidence construction, beating retrieval and program-generation baselines across six benchmarks

    RECAST casts evidence construction as a sequential decision process over retrieval and computation operations: a lightweight RouterLM iteratively selects lexical, semantic, or relational primitives, or requests customized operations that a frozen CompilerLM translates into executable code, then passes accepted evidence to a frozen AnswerLM; RouterLM is trained with SFT followed by GRPO, achieving the strongest average success rate across six heterogeneous benchmarks and zero-shot generalization on three held-out benchmarks.

  8. arXiv

    Keeping only the top-attention tokens without retraining, nine checkpoints need effective attention sets of 7 to 283 tokens, and longer context raises the required set size

    Without retraining, this work retains only the tokens with the highest attention weights at each head, layer, and query while keeping their original weights unchanged, and estimates the effective attention set size needed to stay within a chosen loss tolerance by measuring the increase in negative log-likelihood (NLL); it finds that relatively small selected sets keep NLL close to the full-attention baseline, that attention-based selection substantially outperforms random selection, that the required set size grows with context while its fraction of context decreases, that in BABILong experiments with a fixed annotated supporting fact additional background pushes support tokens down the attention ranking and reduces their attention mass, and that renormalizing the retained weights can subs

  9. Universal Doc AI: A Universal Intelligent Document Management System Combining OCR, RAG, and LLMs

    This paper presents Universal Doc AI, a multimodal intelligent document management system that unifies Optical Character Recognition (OCR), Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), vector-based semantic search, and Large Language Models (LLMs) into a single platform that extracts text from user-uploaded PDFs, scans, images, and handwritten notes, chunks and embeds it for vector indexing, and answers natural-language questions grounded in the uploaded documents, reporting improvements in retrieval accuracy, response relevance, and interaction efficiency over traditional keyword-based search.

You’re all caught up