Skip to main content
Search

# Lead Optimization

3 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    An agent writes its execution experience into reviewable skills: DrugHarness designs and synthesizes an HPK1 compound with 14.19 nM cellular IC50

    Computational drug-discovery agents usually rebuild their tool calls for every task, so a successful strategy rarely carries over. DrugHarness places more than 80 scientific operations and biomedical resources in one workspace, induces action hypotheses with explicit applicability conditions from execution trajectories, and admits them as skills only after an independent review agent checks sources and runs targeted trials when needed. On MolBench, the configuration without evolution reaches 91.9% affinity-comparison accuracy, 10.8 percentage points above reported MolClaw-CC results; in retrospective evaluation, frozen learned skills raise Qwen's optimization success from 79.5% to 87.2%.

  2. Anthropic

    Drug discovery's bottlenecks sit everywhere, not just molecule design: Enveda's Claude review of 1,061 pages cuts human time by 89%

    Anthropic's life sciences team reports that Claude has been used inside real drug programs at six organizations, on tasks reaching from molecule design to manufacturing-document review and regulatory filings. Discussion of AI in drug development has centered on proposing initial molecule designs, while manufacturing paperwork stayed manual, with chemists spending up to 75% of their time on records. In Enveda's test, Claude caught all 11 issues human reviewers had flagged across 1,061 pages of documentation and flagged seven more, cutting human review time by 89%, from over 25 hours to less than three; most of these results remain preclinical.

  3. Artificial intelligence-assisted lead optimization in drug discovery: bridging computational advances and translational challenges

    This review systematically surveys the current landscape of artificial intelligence and machine learning in lead optimization, covering advances in graph neural networks, transformer architectures, diffusion models, and chemical foundation models for molecular design and property prediction, and discusses emerging concepts including data-centric AI, uncertainty quantification, trustworthy AI, the AI optimization paradox, and the shift from molecular prediction toward scientific decision-making, concluding that despite increasing industrial adoption, AI remains dependent on high-quality experimental data, model generalizability, and rigorous experimental validation, and that future progress will depend less on increasingly sophisticated algorithms than on trustworthy AI systems that improve

You’re all caught up