Skip to main content
Search

# Large Audio Language Models

7 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Audio language models miss much of the recording: adding acoustic training lifts structure-task accuracy by up to 44.4 points

    Audio language model benchmark scores can mistake language ability for acoustic understanding. Using synthetic readings and transcripts as references, the study measures the recording gain of the original audio over words across 92 tasks from 6 benchmarks, finding that 19 open models trail Gemini 3.1 Pro by 28.6 and 41.9 percentage points on global-attribute and within-recording structure tasks, with about half or more of each gap lying in the recording gain. Training LoRA adapters with a content anchor in the readout-decline layers of Gemma-4 12B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B raises attribute and structure accuracy by 12.8 to 44.4 points while mean lexical accuracy stays within 1 point of the base models.

  2. arXiv

    Audio reasoning stops spending equal tokens on every step: self-rated section difficulty lifts MMAR to 62.0% while cutting tokens by about 60%

    Large audio-language models that reason explicitly have mostly used one overall difficulty signal to decide whether to think longer, which gives little guidance on how much effort each part of the reasoning trace deserves. SWEAR scores difficulty along five dimensions covering acoustic quality, acoustic complexity and reasoning demand, uses those offline scores to compress reference traces, teaches the model during supervised fine-tuning to predict each section's difficulty before writing it, and then lets reinforcement learning set section length from those self-ratings. On MMAU-test-mini and MMAR, accuracy rises by 2.6 and 6.3 percentage points over CoTA-SFT without difficulty supervision, while generated tokens fall by 60.1% and 62.3%.

  3. arXiv

    Erase the audio region an LALM points to and its "yes" often flips: 16.8% versus 3.1% for a random window

    Deleting the waveform region an audio-language model's claim points to overturns its "sound present" answer more often than deleting an equally sized random window, indicating that these hallucinations are at least partly grounded in locatable audio evidence, and the same contrast lifts Qwen2-Audio accuracy from 57.1% to 71.9%.

  4. arXiv

    AdaLoop lets audio language models spend reasoning depth by question difficulty, lifting average accuracy 2.9 to 3.8 points on three backbones

    AdaLoop replaces the linear projection between an audio encoder and a language model with a lightweight recurrent module in which a shared, question-guided transformer block iteratively refines the audio representation and a learned halting mechanism decides how many steps each audio–question pair needs; across Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, Kimi-Audio-7B-Instruct, and MiMo-Audio-7B-Instruct on MMSU, MMAU-Pro, and MMAR it raises average accuracy by 2.9 to 3.8 points, with gains concentrated on perception-heavy subtasks, and the learned depth distribution shows signal-level questions averaging 5.7 iterations versus 2.6 for semantic ones.

  5. arXiv

    Fine-tuning large audio language models with low-level acoustic features and speaker demographics surpasses deep-learning baselines for dysarthric speech detection, with Qwen2-Audio-Instruct reaching state-of-the-art performance

    The work proposes a framework that fine-tunes Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) for dysarthric speech detection on speech recordings combined with textual information comprising low-level acoustic features and speaker demographics; across two LALMs the framework outperforms deep-learning-based baselines, with Qwen2-Audio-Instruct achieving state-of-the-art performance, and an ablation study shows that incorporating acoustic features and speaker demographics during fine-tuning improves LALM performance, while LALMs alone exhibit only chance-level zero-shot performance.

  6. arXiv

    Extending mDPO to Audio: Qwen2-Audio Gains 14.0 Points on DCASE 2025 and 27.4 Points on AH Existence

    This work ports multimodal Direct Preference Optimization (mDPO) from vision-language models to the audio domain, building preference pairs that contrast intact audio with acoustically perturbed audio (reversal, random noise, time and frequency masking) and training Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct, raising DCASE 2025 audio QA accuracy from 56.0% to 70.0% and AH Existence accuracy from 55.6% to 83.0%.

  7. arXiv

    VoxMem tests 15 audio LLMs on 3,196 questions: none tops 40% at 32K, and swapping audio for transcripts drops speaker accuracy from 69.8% to 10.3%

    The authors propose a two-axis taxonomy of spoken conversational memory — acoustic evidence type (speech semantics, speaker identity, paralinguistic cues, environmental sound) crossed with memory operation (information extraction, multi-session reasoning, temporal evolution tracking, answer refusal) — and build VoxMem on it: 3,196 evaluation instances over 34,743 spoken sessions (177 hours) at four context budgets from 8K to 64K tokens; evaluating 15 large audio language models, no model exceeds 40% overall accuracy at 32K (best 38.5%), models remember what was said far better than who said it, how it was said, or what was audible, and replacing audio with exact transcripts drops speaker accuracy from 69.8% to 10.3% while speech-semantics accuracy barely moves (75.9% to 71.0%).

You’re all caught up