Skip to main content
Search

# Medical Vision-Language Models

4 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. aclanthology.org

    Medical vision-language models get a calibration stress test: 1,638 controlled runs expose where confidence breaks

    Evaluation of medical vision-language models has centered on accuracy, leaving whether their confidence is trustworthy largely untested. MVC-Bench splits calibration into three axes, robustness, effectiveness of calibration and prompt-tuning methods, and stability under prompt templates and random seeds, spanning fundus, histopathology and chest X-ray modalities, eight backbones and six prompt-tuning methods across 1,638 controlled experiments. In-domain calibration rankings barely survive domain shift, with a mean Kendall correlation of -0.0598 over 30 rank-transfer tests and none significantly positive; the proposed Multi-Class Margin regularizer reaches the lowest ECE in 10 of 12 in-domain settings but only 4 under domain shift.

  2. aclanthology.org

    Prompts can fix the answer while visual evidence collapses: training-free head damping cuts flip rate to 34.60%

    Medical vision-language models cave to authoritative prompts, and prompt-level defenses can restore the right answer while visual evidence use still collapses in late fusion layers. HD-AS changes no parameters: it ranks attention heads by activation drift between neutral and biased prompts, then damps those heads' output projections at inference. On SLAKE, Qwen2.5-VL-7B's mean conditional flip rate falls to 34.60% versus 38.29% for contrastive decoding, with neutral-prompt accuracy held at 74.37%.

  3. arXiv

    ΔRepresentation models phenotypes as representation increments over normal anatomy via counterfactual reasoning, improving lesion grounding and phenotype recognition across six medical VLMs

    The work proposes ΔRepresentation, a visual phenotype representation learning framework for medical VLMs: BaseAnatomy applies geometry supervision to normal anatomical representations using ideal spatial distributions, while Phenotype uses counterfactual reasoning to estimate a normal anatomical reference for each pathological patch and learn phenotype-specific representation increments that cluster by phenotype. On ReXGroundingCT and LIDC-IDRI, it consistently improves lesion grounding and phenotype recognition across six pretrained medical VLMs.

  4. arXiv

    ClinCoT pushes preference optimization from answer-level correction down to lesion-region reasoning: it beats MMedPO and other baselines on most metrics across SLAKE, VQA-RAD and IU-Xray, with more consistent gains after SFT initialization

    The work proposes ClinCoT, a clinical-aware visual chain-of-thought framework: it uses hypotheses-driven region proposals (disease-conditioned activation maps from a clinical-aware tool such as MedKLIP, thresholded into candidate regions), has the target Med-VLM generate multiple region-conditioned reasoning chains by jointly processing the original image and each candidate region, scores them with two Med-LLM evaluators that combine current-step score with next-step influence and penalize evaluator disagreement, and trains with a score-margin-aware DPO plus iterative regeneration of preference data; across SLAKE, VQA-RAD and IU-Xray it outperforms DPO, Self-Rewarding, STLLaVA-Med, POVID, SIMA, FiSAO and MMedPO on most metrics, is strongest on report generation, falls below MMedPO on VQA-R

You’re all caught up