Skip to main content
Search

# Uncertainty Quantification

14 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Delayed feedback meets a memory cap: CA-OCRC keeps online risk control on target with capacity growing only logarithmically in the maximum delay

    Online conformal risk control has assumed each round's loss arrives immediately and intact, yet real systems delay feedback and can track only a limited number of pending predictions, so some feedback is lost for good. CA-OCRC designs the tracking policy and the prediction sets together: each round draws a random proxy delay, is tracked while capacity allows until its feedback arrives or the proxy delay expires, and a two-level inverse probability weighting compensates for lost feedback. Risk bounds for arbitrary and stochastic delays follow, and optimizing the proxy delay distribution shows that capacity growing only logarithmically in the maximum delay suffices to match the convergence rate of OCRC with unlimited feedback.

  2. arXiv

    Bifidelity material models get a posterior, not just a fit: a sampling hypernetwork runs Langevin trajectories over network weights

    Bifidelity modeling uses cheap low-fidelity simulations to supplement scarce high-fidelity experiments, but the usual product is a single deterministic fit that says little about how trustworthy a prediction is. This work extends a single-fidelity Langevin sampling hypernetwork to bifidelity data, using a shared-latent data model that predicts both the low-fidelity response and the high-fidelity correction while a learned drift network generates parameter samples from the posterior score. On a synthetic hyperelastic case, conditional staged training cut the SPD-drift RMSE from 0.075 to 0.024 and the convex-potential drift from 0.081 to 0.017; on experimental and DNS data, predicting the high-fidelity response directly gave lower error than an additive discrepancy.

  3. arXiv

    Neural processes assumed clean inputs: DnNP folds denoising into meta-learning and cuts PM2.5 interpolation RMSE by up to 30%

    Standard neural processes treat inputs as noise-free observations, so sensor measurement error degrades both predictions and uncertainty estimates. DnNP makes the clean input a latent variable inside the neural-process framework and trains a denoiser jointly with meta-learning through variational inference, predicting directly from noisy inputs. On PM2.5 spatial interpolation from 34 air-quality sensors in Brookline, Massachusetts, DnNP reduces RMSE by up to 30% and NLL by up to 73% relative to standard neural processes.

  4. arXiv

    Array coherence loss stops being discarded as noise: Topophone2 inverts array covariance into a slowness energy distribution

    Array processing has long treated inter-sensor coherence loss as a nuisance, and conventional beamforming assumes a far-field point source with incoherent noise between sensors. Topophone2 models the array covariance as a mixture of energy distributions over slowness, describing signal and environmental noise with skew-normal and angular-harmonic distributions that have analytical characteristic functions, then computes the posterior by variational Bayesian inference. On a synthetic abyssal T-phase, adding a fourth hydrophone raises the information gain on the angular-harmonic noise coefficients by 142%, while the gain on signal parameters and SNR rises by less than 8%.

  5. arXiv

    Seismic velocity inversion drops its handcrafted prior: a diffusion model as projector cuts Marmousi MAE from 94.80 to 92.68

    Full waveform inversion reconstructs subsurface velocity models from seismic records, but it is highly nonlinear and ill-posed, and an inaccurate initial model or noisy data can push it to a wrong solution. Bayesian full waveform inversion built on annealed Stein variational gradient descent previously constrained its particles with handcrafted Gaussian or smoothing priors that cannot represent complex geology. This work embeds a diffusion model trained on the GeoFWI dataset as an implicit geological projection operator inside the particle update, lowering mean absolute error on the Marmousi synthetic model from 94.80 with the classic method to 92.68, raising structural similarity from 0.69 to 0.72, and concentrating posterior uncertainty near deep structures and high-contrast interfaces.

  6. Evidential deep learning hits an evidence ceiling: as confidence nears one, the active set collapses to a single class

    Evidential deep learning represents classification uncertainty through Dirichlet parameters, but the standard objective shows evidence contraction at high confidence. This work analyzes the optimization landscape of the regularized Dirichlet likelihood on a box domain, proves that the second-order sufficient conditions reduce to a scalar self-consistency derivative being positive, and gives an enumeration algorithm with a finite-convergence guarantee. On logits from a ResNet-18 trained on CIFAR-10, total evidence rises monotonically with confidence yet never exceeds a theoretical threshold near 19.75, while the active set shrinks from about 2.05 classes to one.

  7. arXiv

    Polynomial-chaos surrogates get locally adaptive intervals: high-noise regions stop being under-covered, from a single fit

    Polynomial chaos expansions have long offered only global error metrics, leaving the reliability of an individual prediction unstated; normalizing jackknife+ conformal nonconformity scores with an auxiliary polynomial chaos model makes interval width follow local input uncertainty. For fixed-basis, least-squares-fitted expansions every quantity is available in closed form, so the finite-sample jackknife+ coverage guarantee is retained without retraining; on a cantilever-beam benchmark with known heteroscedastic noise and on steam-generator clogging simulation data, the adaptive intervals reach target coverage and clearly outperform non-adaptive ones in high-uncertainty regions.

  8. arXiv

    95% intervals calibrated on random splits fail outside the training envelope: hard-shift coverage falls to 0.40–0.75 across seven engineering datasets

    Prediction intervals for engineering regression are usually calibrated on random splits, while deployment happens outside training conditions. A benchmark splits seven public engineering datasets into in-distribution, soft-shift and hard-shift rungs along physically meaningful shift variables, and compares 12 uncertainty quantification methods from five families tuned on source data only. In distribution, conformal methods cover at least 0.946 on every dataset; under hard shift, mean coverage falls to 0.40–0.75 for the 11 methods that always return an interval, and no systematic difference in method ranks is detected.

  9. Nuclear models no longer extrapolate with a fixed error: uncertainty now grows with distance, giving drip-line calls a statistical footing

    For nuclear regions experiments cannot reach, models lose predictive power the further they extrapolate, yet model combinations usually treat theoretical error as constant. A heteroscedastic Bayesian model combination treats the combined theoretical uncertainty as a dynamic quantity that varies with position, applied to an ensemble of realistic energy density functionals with focus on the Z = 46–52 isotopic chains. Validated against experimental data and synthetic data built to probe deep extrapolation, it yields better calibration metrics and statistically principled assessments of the particle drip lines.

  10. arXiv

    Tabular foundation model rankings shuffle across benchmarks: on 160 classification and 81 regression datasets, accurate point predictions do not guarantee trustworthy intervals

    Across 160 classification and 81 regression datasets, tabular foundation model rankings change with the benchmark and the reliability metric, and regression models that already sit near nominal marginal coverage still under-cover in their worst feature slab, so model selection cannot rest on aggregate predictive accuracy alone.