Skip to main content
Search

# Survival Prediction

8 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. bioRxiv

    Younger breast cancer survival models borrow from older cohorts: LSAT-EN tunes borrowing per omics layer and reaches 0.819 four-year AUC

    Younger breast cancer patients have too few samples to train reliable prognostic models, so LSAT-EN treats older patients as a source cohort and sets the strength of borrowing toward the source coefficients separately for each of six omics layers, while elastic-net regularization selects variables. In TCGA-BRCA, with patients aged 60 and older as source and those under 50 as target, four-year binary survival prediction reached an AUC of 0.819, above 0.774 for pooled fitting, 0.757 for target-only fitting, 0.728 for glmtrans and 0.780 for GAS-EN. In simulation the advantage grew as source-target differences and target-sample scarcity increased.

  2. Nature Genetics

    Childhood brain tumor prognosis moves past subgroup labels: MANTIS draws 10-year individual survival curves from methylation, reaching c-index 0.80

    Treating childhood medulloblastoma and ependymoma means trading recurrence risk against the long-term side effects of radiotherapy, yet current clinical indicators and molecular subgroups only give group-level risk. MANTIS takes genome-wide DNA methylation array data plus gene-level copy-number variation and uses a neural network to output individualized 10-year survival probability curves, reaching a c-index as high as 0.80 ± 0.07 in independent clinical trial cohorts, above current clinical indicators and subgroup-only models. An extension of the same framework flags about 60% of average-risk medulloblastoma patients who showed no significant survival disadvantage (P = 0.683) under lower-dose craniospinal irradiation.

  3. bioRxiv

    Cell-line drug sensitivity must reach patients: MODAE+ aligns the two domains while keeping tumour lineage, and its predicted sensitivity tracks survival

    Transferring drug sensitivity from cancer cell lines to patient tumours is hard because aligning the two domains can erase tumour-lineage structure. MODAE+ jointly optimizes domain alignment, deconfounding, drug-response prediction, survival prediction and lineage classification in one shared latent space, with adaptive multitask weighting to balance them. On matched treated TCGA subsets, its predicted sensitivity reached a 41.5% Cox-significant rate for overall survival, versus 4.9% for CODE-AE-ADV.

  4. bioRxiv

    Lung adenocarcinoma survival models stop letting molecular data dominate: clinical anchoring plus sparse correction lifts C-index from 0.697 to 0.7246

    Molecular data in lung adenocarcinoma are high-dimensional relative to the number of observed events, so concatenating them into a survival model invites overfitting and unstable feature selection. CAISL writes predicted risk as a clinical Cox risk plus a sparse molecular correction, and penalizes how much that correction varies across resampled training cohorts. On 470 TCGA-LUAD patients with 119 observed deaths, mean C-index across five independent cross-validation runs was 0.7246 versus 0.6970 for clinical Cox, a paired gain of 0.0276 (95% CI 0.005–0.050); this is internal validation and still needs an independent cohort.

  5. arXiv

    A CT foundation model built for cancer patients' chest-abdomen-pelvis scans lifts AUC to 0.767 from 0.695

    CAPTOR, a vision-language foundation model pretrained on 25,512 chest-abdomen-pelvis CT-report pairs from cancer-focused exams, outperformed existing CT foundation models in its target setting. Disease classification reached an AUC of 0.767 versus 0.695 for the next-best model on the full chest-abdomen-pelvis subset, and 0.784 versus 0.734 on the oncologic subset. It encodes organ-centered crops of whole exams but makes study-level, not lesion-level, judgments.

  6. Sampled on outcome, still predictable: a weighted gradient boosting machine matches Cox on uranium miner cancer data

    In outcome-dependent sampling, covariates are collected for only part of the cohort, so standard survival models trained on the sampled data target a distribution that differs from the cohort. A gradient boosting machine carries the sampling weights into training and tuning, selecting iterations by a weighted integrated Brier score, and the weighted empirical risk is shown to converge to the corresponding integrated Brier risk. In simulations it outperformed the Cox model in high-dimensional and nonlinear settings, and on uranium miner cancer data the test C-index was 0.803 versus 0.801 for Cox.

  7. SpaCEy links tissue spatial patterns to clinical outcomes with an explainable graph neural network, improving prediction and surfacing spatial markers in lung and breast cancer cohorts

    The authors present SpaCEy (Spatial Clinical Explainability), an explainable graph neural network that builds each tissue sample into a spatial graph via Delaunay triangulation, with nodes as single-cell protein-marker abundances and no predefined cell-type or anatomical-region inputs, learns predictive embeddings with a GNN, and uses a GNNExplainer-style explainer to output edge masks that are aggregated over k-hop neighbourhoods into node importance, thereby localising contiguous outcome-associated spatial regions and key proteins; it predicted progression in a 416-patient lung adenocarcinoma cohort (accuracy 0.68, F1 0.68, AUC 0.62, versus Ali et al. 0.61/0.59/0.57 and SPACE-GM 0.55/0.52/0.

  8. Radiomics and its application to neuro-oncology: A narrative review of advances, clinical application and implementation challenges

    This narrative review searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (2012-2024) to map the role of radiomics and artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology across diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic potential, reporting that radiomics can automatically extract quantitative features from MRI, CT and PET/CT that are not visible to the human eye, has been shown useful for pre-surgical classification of gliomas, survival prediction and differentiation between tumour progression and pseudo-progression, may improve diagnostic accuracy and support patient stratification by molecular biomarkers such as IDH and MGMT when integrated with deep learning, and links image phenotypes to genetic alterations through radiogenomics to enhance personalised medicine, while limitations persist from lack of proto

You’re all caught up