Skip to main content
Search

# Causal Discovery

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Where semantic priors should enter causal discovery: orientation gains hold, but query placement and admission certificates do not yet

    Observational data often leave causal directions unresolved or unstable, and large language models can propose directions from variable names and descriptions. This study splits the use of semantic information into query allocation, proposal admission and graph retention, and tests each on the Asia, Sachs, Child, Insurance and Alarm benchmark networks. Semantic orientation beats coin-flip orientation, but targeting unstable edges shows no established advantage over matched-random allocation; the tested admission certificate can only abstain given the available calibration tasks, and learned references contain the true DAG in only three of 80 planned tasks.

  2. arXiv

    Constitutive discovery now asks which variable drives which mechanism: climate-chamber interventions recover the true graph in 7 of 10 runs, observational data in none

    Constitutive model discovery now asks which environmental variable drives which mechanism, not merely which candidate terms fit the response. A constitutive model with internal variables is written as a time-unrolled structural causal model, candidate graphs are scored by a weak-form equilibrium gap through the boundary value problem, and climate-chamber protocols count as interventions. On a synthetic perforated plate at about 0.01 px displacement noise, interventional data recover the true graph exactly in 7 of 10 runs, with no attribution error; correlated observational data never do.

You’re all caught up