Where semantic priors should enter causal discovery: orientation gains hold, but query placement and admission certificates do not yet
Observational data often leave causal directions unresolved or unstable, and large language models can propose directions from variable names and descriptions. This study splits the use of semantic information into query allocation, proposal admission and graph retention, and tests each on the Asia, Sachs, Child, Insurance and Alarm benchmark networks. Semantic orientation beats coin-flip orientation, but targeting unstable edges shows no established advantage over matched-random allocation; the tested admission certificate can only abstain given the available calibration tasks, and learned references contain the true DAG in only three of 80 planned tasks.