Skip to main content
Search

# Video Understanding

4 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Video models learn to check the evidence before reasoning: EVAThink hits 63.5% average at 32 frames with 6.7K samples and about 62% shorter output than always reasoning

    EVAThink turns whether a sampled set of frames is enough to answer directly into a training signal: for the same question and answer it builds evidence-dense and evidence-sparse views of a video and keeps only pairs where direct answering degrades on the sparse view but explicit reasoning recovers accuracy, then uses two-stage reinforcement learning to teach the model to switch between direct answering and reasoning. Trained on only 6.7K samples, it reaches 63.5% and 65.6% average across six video understanding benchmarks under fixed 32- and 64-frame budgets, both above the Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct base; at 64 frames the adaptive mode beats direct-only and think-only by 2.3 and 3.6 percentage points and cuts output length by about 62% relative to think-only.

  2. arXiv

    Driving-video motion questions stump six video-language models under prompting, but light finetuning nearly solves them

    On CARLA third-person driving videos, six open-source video-language models judging forward/backward, left/right, and accelerate/decelerate stayed near chance under standard, visual, few-shot, and chain-of-thought prompting, with systematic class biases such as every model scoring 100% on forward and 0% on backward. LoRA finetuning then reached near-perfect held-out accuracy for all models except VideoLLaMA2 on accelerate/decelerate, and simple classifiers on pre- and post-compression visual features decoded motion cues at high accuracy. The motion information is present inside the models, but the prompted prediction pathway does not reliably use it.

  3. arXiv

    Video LLMs stop comparing every token: codec motion and residuals cut matching by two-thirds

    Compressing visual tokens for video large language models costs feature comparisons in the compression decisions themselves. This method aligns reference-frame dependencies, motion vectors and residuals already present in compressed video to the visual token grid, uses them to propose small candidate sets, then verifies with local visual similarity. Across three video LLMs and four video-understanding benchmarks, performance matches the training-free baseline FlashVID and sometimes exceeds it, while comparisons for token protection and temporal matching drop substantially.

  4. arXiv

    Omni-Decision replaces dialogue history with an evidence ledger, reaching 81.4% on OmniGAIA at about 43% of Gemini-3.1-Pro's cost

    The work presents Omni-Decision, an omni-modal agent that replaces the growing dialogue history with an explicit evidence ledger, where a critic reads each noisy observation and passes only usable content to the ledger so the planner works from a compact context throughout the task; each run records state, action, and verdict at every step, and supervised fine-tuning plus decision-level reinforcement learning on these trajectories further improve the planner, yielding state-of-the-art 81.4% accuracy on OmniGAIA at roughly 43% of Gemini-3.1-Pro's cost per question and 65.0% on WorldSense long-video understanding, level with the strongest end-to-end model.

You’re all caught up