Skip to main content
Search

# User Simulation

3 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    User simulators now write a private review each turn: assistant RL keeps its score and halves the compute

    A user simulator now writes a first-person evaluation of the assistant before producing its next line, including a 1-to-5 rating and a critique-or-praise judgment; on real user-ChatGPT logs it tracks human users better than prompted simulators of the same size, and it lets multi-turn RL train assistants to comparable quality with less than half the compute.

  2. arXiv

    Ask before you code: 341 repository-level tasks show clarification lifts requirement alignment by 133%

    For repository-level software development, researchers built ReqClarifyBench, pairing 341 tasks with vague user intents, human-validated requirement documents, and code evaluation artifacts, and ran multi-turn clarification with simulated users carrying three real-world personas. Across six LLMs, asking effectively did not mean writing better documents: the strongest questioner scored lower on requirement alignment, yet adding interactive clarification raised average alignment from 0.212 to 0.494, a 133.1% relative gain, with code-generation scores rising too.

  3. arXiv

    No individual labels needed: reasoning learned from prediction-market prices transfers zero-shot to user simulation

    A language model learns behavioral reasoning from prediction-market price movements, reaching 0.674 directional accuracy on Polymarket and transferring zero-shot to four user-simulation benchmarks without any individual-level annotations.

You’re all caught up