Skip to main content
Search

# Intrinsic Rewards

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    User simulators now write a private review each turn: assistant RL keeps its score and halves the compute

    A user simulator now writes a first-person evaluation of the assistant before producing its next line, including a 1-to-5 rating and a critique-or-praise judgment; on real user-ChatGPT logs it tracks human users better than prompted simulators of the same size, and it lets multi-turn RL train assistants to comparable quality with less than half the compute.

  2. arXiv

    Researchers propose a counterfactual-information criterion and build a single simple environment showing that optimal policies for count-based, prediction-error, empowerment, and information-gain intrinsic rewards are Pareto-suboptimal under that criterion

    The work proposes a formal exploration criterion that compares policies by the counterfactual information they acquire, meaning how well their histories can substitute for experience under alternative policies, and constructs a single simple environment in which the maximizing policies of specified count-based, prediction-error, empowerment, and information-gain objectives are Pareto-suboptimal at acquiring counterfactual information; it then explains these failures, establishes conditions under which existing intrinsic rewards successfully encourage optimal exploration, and constructs an objective that assigns higher value whenever exploration strictly improves under the criterion.

You’re all caught up