Skip to main content
Search

# Subliminal Learning

3 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. Noise-only distillation is no sanitizer: a shared public checkpoint lets a student inherit its teacher's memorized labels and backdoors

    Distilling a teacher on pure Gaussian noise still hands the student the teacher's memorized training records and planted backdoors whenever both start from the same public initialization. On MNIST, distilling only never-trained auxiliary outputs yields a membership-inference AUC of 0.86 and a 93% backdoor attack-success lift, while an independently initialized student stays near chance. In a fine-tuning threat model, an attacker with the public base but no data recovers the memorized labels of 93% of private canaries from noise queries alone.

  2. arXiv

    Distillation makes secret-keeping models confess more readily, and can suppress animal-preference transfer while preserving math ability

    The authors introduce and separately validate two distillation strategies: Distillation for Incrimination (DFI) distills AuditBench secret-keeping models back into their instruction-tuned base, yielding students that confess hidden quirks more often than their teachers, indicating that knowledge of the behavior transfers more readily than the propensity to conceal it; Distillation for Capabilities (DFC) preserves math capability while few-unique-example multi-epoch training and inoculation prompting substantially reduce subliminal transfer of an animal preference used as a misalignment proxy.

  3. arXiv

    Post-training capabilities leak through unrelated text: one teacher word per prompt yields a 5.34 pp gain on HumanEval+

    The authors introduce Active Taskless Distillation (ATD), which selects prompts where the teacher and student's shared public ancestor is nearly indifferent between two ordinary words, and lets a student initialized from that ancestor learn solely from the resulting prompt-word pairs, without target-task examples, teacher logits, or teacher parameters; in the primary coding experiment with Qwen2.5-1.5B, 5,664 samples yield a 5.34 pp gain on HumanEval+ over an exact nuisance-matched control, with transfer also shown in scientific knowledge, commonsense reasoning, and reading comprehension across additional model generations, sizes, and families, and functional analyses indicating the learned signal is composable and tracks the teacher's update strength.

You’re all caught up