Skip to main content
Search

# Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics

4 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. bioRxiv

    RI-SINDy pulls Hill terms out of the regression: library conditioning drops 3–45× on oscillating gene networks

    RI-SINDy removes known Hill-type regulatory terms from the sparse-regression library and solves each coefficient separately from a drift-balance condition, the near-zero time average of the derivative along a bounded trajectory, avoiding the ill-conditioning that arises when regulatory and polynomial terms are nearly collinear over an oscillation. On Hes1 experimental data it gives the lowest trajectory error among Traditional SINDy, SR3 and Nullcline Reconstruction; on synthetic Goodwin and NF-κB models it recovers the correct sparse structure, and in a Goodwin noise sweep it still finds all 6 active terms at 15% noise.

  2. arXiv

    Controller retuning now screens stability first: compressor simulation deploys zero unstable candidates

    On an axial compressor-plenum-throttle simulation, UQ-ACE infers a posterior over local dynamics from closed-loop data and blocks candidates whose stability probability falls short, producing no unstable trajectories across 100 runs.

  3. arXiv

    Three-sensor machine-learning phase-amplitude reduction speeds airfoil wake synchronization eightfold while curbing lift fluctuations

    This study combines phase-amplitude reduction with nonlinear machine-learning sparse-sensor reconstruction to estimate phase and amplitude sensitivity fields from only three airfoil-surface sensors and analytically derive optimal actuation waveforms for fast synchronization of post-stall airfoil wake shedding; the identified optimal forcing alters wake frequency eight times faster than standard sinusoidal actuation, and the amplitude-penalized waveform suppresses lift-coefficient fluctuation relative to the optimal forcing without amplitude penalty.

  4. arXiv

    TUM team surveys 329 works on physics-embedded robot learning: 71% encode physics in architectures, only 4% combine multiple embedding routes

    This survey systematically reviews methods that embed physics priors into robot learning and proposes a unified taxonomy classifying existing work by where physics is embedded—physics-guided inputs, data, and representations; physics-encoded model architectures; and physics-informed training losses—then reviews methods for robot dynamics learning, trajectory planning and prediction, control, and estimation together with the open-source software ecosystem, reporting that physics-encoded architectures account for 71% of surveyed methods, physics-guided 16%, and physics-informed 13%, while only 4% combine more than one embedding route.

You’re all caught up