Skip to main content
Search

# Quantile Loss

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Ship track forecasts move to Transformers: 0.18 km average error, prediction interval in one pass

    Ship trajectory forecasting no longer needs recurrent networks or repeated sampling. Earlier AIS-based models either used only the target vessel's history or relied on clustering other vessels, and approximated probability intervals through multiple forward passes. Here the vessel's past positions and a local KDE heat map are fed to a Transformer trained with quantile loss, reaching about 0.18 km average displacement error across three Danish water areas while emitting a prediction interval in a single forward pass.

  2. arXiv

    Tabular regression objectives get a fresh ranking: quantile loss is steadier on four backbones, while early stopping stalls between noise regions

    A systematic re-evaluation across 41 tabular datasets under one protocol finds quantile loss gives more consistent test-RMSE gains over tuned mean squared error on MLP, TabPack, RealMLP and TabM, and reveals that regions with different noise levels prefer different stopping epochs.

You’re all caught up