Skip to main content
Search

# PDE Solving

6 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Gravitational-wave solvers get a neural preconditioner: 2 to 15 fewer GMRES iterations than basic ILU in the hardest high-frequency regime

    High-accuracy gravitational-wave source modeling has long avoided machine learning because neural networks carry a noise floor. Researchers trained a graph neural network as a preconditioner for an iterative solver, leaving the traditional GMRES to enforce final accuracy while the network only accelerates convergence. On the high-frequency elliptic equations for asymmetric-mass black hole binaries, the hardest parameter regions need 2 to 15 fewer GMRES iterations than basic ILU and 2 to 4 times less wall time than the next best method.

  2. arXiv

    Agents must now identify the PDE themselves: RSI-PDEbench tests them on 1,001 cases, lifting mean pass rates by up to 181.9% across four models

    Recovering a partial differential equation from sampled solution data demands expert work in equation discovery, coefficient estimation and numerical solver configuration. RSI-PDEbench turns that workflow into a benchmark of 1,001 cases over 42 equation templates, split into noise-free, 50% Gaussian-noise and unseen-template-with-shifted-coefficient settings; the accompanying RSI-PDE agent shortlists candidate equations by residual, refines coefficients and solvers with relative feedback, and keeps improvements behind a validation gate. Across four frontier models its mean pass rate rises 106.5–181.9% over single-run baselines and 3.0–19.6% over native agent harnesses.

  3. arXiv

    Physics-informed networks get a coordinate change: CTPINN flattens steep gradients and recovers accuracy on boundary layers

    Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) often lose accuracy on PDEs with sharp gradients, partly because the network struggles to represent high-frequency variation. CTPINN adds a learnable coordinate transformation alongside the solution network, mapping the physical domain to a computational domain where the solution is approximately affine and gradients are more evenly distributed. The explicit construction restores accuracy on boundary-layer problems, and the implicit construction, plugged into PirateNet, SPINN and QRPINN, improves accuracy across several benchmark equations.

  4. aclanthology.org

    PDE solver debugging stops rewriting whole files: masking just the faulty span cuts one repair from 64.85 s to 0.748 s

    Automatic repair of PDE solvers now runs on a discrete diffusion language model: instead of rewriting the whole file left to right, it re-masks only the faulty code span and infills it with both left and right context visible. On five PDEBench families, with the same checkpoint, localized infilling raised average Pass@32 from 0.4938 to 0.5063 and cut per-attempt repair latency from 64.85 s to 0.748 s; from-scratch generation remains slower than same-scale autoregressive models, and worst-case end-to-end cost averages 55.5 s.

  5. arXiv

    Three-dimensional beam evolution skips frame-by-frame PIC: dynamics learned in latent space, physics enforced by construction

    GLOBE compresses three-dimensional beam–field states into a compact latent space, learns the dominant evolution with a control-conditioned neural operator, and captures fine-scale residuals with a generative model, then applies parameter-free constraint operators after decoding. On two high-resolution 3D benchmarks, bunched-beam transport and plasma-wakefield acceleration, relative error is 9% and 13% lower than the strongest baseline DPOT, mid-frequency spectral error is 54% and 20% lower, and hours of particle simulation become about a minute per rollout.

  6. Learning nonlinear finite element solution operators with MLPs and energy minimization yields small learning errors on parametric Poisson, Gaussian random field, and nonlinear elasticity cases, and speeds up Newton's method when the network prediction is used as an initial guess

    The authors develop and evaluate a data-free, physics-informed method for learning solution operators: after a finite element discretization, a multilayer perceptron (MLP) maps problem data parameters (boundary conditions, coefficients, right-hand sides, etc.) to the finite element degrees of freedom, with a loss function given by the expected energy functional, plus a parallelizable training algorithm that can use random batches of mesh elements; on a parametric Poisson problem, a Gaussian random field coefficient problem, and a nonlinear neo-Hookean elastic beam, learning errors are small (e.g., for the parametric problem with the full mesh and a 4·512 network, mean relative energy error 2.0e-4, L2 0.0020, H1 0.

You’re all caught up