Skip to main content
Search

# Energy Minimization

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Finite-element surrogates swap the displacement loss for energy: median von Mises error falls 6.1-fold in 3D and more than halves in 2D

    Finite-element surrogates are usually trained and compared by displacement error, although engineering decisions rest on stresses. This study replaces the norm of the supervised loss with the energy norm of the assembled stiffness matrix, leaving everything else fixed; in pre-registered comparisons a three-dimensional transformer's median von Mises error fell 6.1-fold and the two-dimensional mean fell by more than half, also on held-out instances, and training on the energy alone without solutions came close to that accuracy.

  2. Learning nonlinear finite element solution operators with MLPs and energy minimization yields small learning errors on parametric Poisson, Gaussian random field, and nonlinear elasticity cases, and speeds up Newton's method when the network prediction is used as an initial guess

    The authors develop and evaluate a data-free, physics-informed method for learning solution operators: after a finite element discretization, a multilayer perceptron (MLP) maps problem data parameters (boundary conditions, coefficients, right-hand sides, etc.) to the finite element degrees of freedom, with a loss function given by the expected energy functional, plus a parallelizable training algorithm that can use random batches of mesh elements; on a parametric Poisson problem, a Gaussian random field coefficient problem, and a nonlinear neo-Hookean elastic beam, learning errors are small (e.g., for the parametric problem with the full mesh and a 4·512 network, mean relative energy error 2.0e-4, L2 0.0020, H1 0.

You’re all caught up