Skip to main content
Search

# Spatial Prediction

3 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Spatial reasoning moves past what is visible: 3,862 questions ask what an intervention changes, and the best model reaches 58.0% against 87.2% for humans

    Spatial reasoning evaluation shifts from reading relations already visible in the input to predicting the unseen outcome of an intervention, and SpaceCast-Bench splits that ability into static perception, local prediction and global prediction across 3,862 questions from 182 real scenes, where the strongest model reaches only 58.0% against 87.2% for humans.

  2. arXiv

    Spatial prediction without retraining per data model: one process model handles counts, censoring and areal aggregates

    Spatial prediction targets the conditional distribution of a latent spatial field given observations, which is rarely available in closed form and is hard to sample. Guided diffusion separates the two: an unconditional diffusion model is trained on the process model alone, and a differentiable likelihood gradient is added during reverse diffusion at prediction time, so one trained process model serves many data models. Across Gaussian processes, a Ginzburg–Landau amplitude field and a methane-flux inversion over the UK and Ireland, the predictive distributions match exact or MCMC results and scale linearly with the latent dimension at higher resolutions.

  3. arXiv

    No Trajectories, No Satellite Imagery: 1.05 Million US Grid Cells Compressed to 256 Structural Dimensions

    PlacePulse compresses 1,055,537 US H3 resolution-7 cells into 256-dimensional unit-norm vectors using only static structural attributes such as demographics, businesses and environmental risk, beating a dimensionality-matched feature-selection baseline on 74 external targets and leading Google's Population Dynamics Foundation Model on health and economic outcomes.

You’re all caught up