Skip to main content
Search

Hongxing Li

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Spatial reasoning moves past what is visible: 3,862 questions ask what an intervention changes, and the best model reaches 58.0% against 87.2% for humans

    Spatial reasoning evaluation shifts from reading relations already visible in the input to predicting the unseen outcome of an intervention, and SpaceCast-Bench splits that ability into static perception, local prediction and global prediction across 3,862 questions from 182 real scenes, where the strongest model reaches only 58.0% against 87.2% for humans.

  2. arXiv

    Spatial reasoning stops guessing depth: 3D cues only in training, RGB-only at inference, 37.6 average on four benchmarks

    Vision-language models struggle with spatial reasoning because RGB inputs do not directly supply geometric evidence, and existing fixes either add 3D at inference, paying architecture and latency costs, or train on outcome rewards that supervise only the final answer. GPD renders depth, semantic segmentation and bird's-eye-view layout as compact text, routes the question-relevant subset to the teacher alongside the reference answer, and applies a privileged KL only to incorrect trajectories within GRPO, leaving the deployed model RGB-only. On the 4B backbone it reaches 57.1 on VSI-Bench and 37.6 average across MindCube, SPAR-Bench, MMSI-Bench and ViewSpatial, above GRPO and answer-privileged OPSD.

You’re all caught up