Skip to main content
Search

# Brain Age Prediction

4 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Two-view covariances no longer learned as one blob: CANE separates in-view and cross-view structure and cuts brain-age error to 4.97 years

    In two-view data, each view has its own covariance and a cross-view covariance links them, yet covariance neural networks handled only single-view data and could not distinguish these structures once the views were concatenated. CANE splits the model into an in-view covariance filtering stage and a cross-view covariance filtering stage, replacing the whitening and singular-vector selection of canonical correlation analysis with learnable polynomial responses on the covariance spectrum, and trains directly on the downstream task. Across seven brain-imaging and motion-sensing datasets, CANE is best or tied for best on six, reaching a mean absolute error of 4.97 years for age prediction on ADNI1, often with fewer parameters than a two-view VNN.

  2. A personal reference curve for brain wiring: BRIDGE cuts brain-age error by 3%–9% and ties deviation scores to ADOS in autistic boys

    Brain-connectivity differences in autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders have mostly been read from group-average case-control contrasts, which flatten individual variation. BRIDGE combines a graph variational autoencoder with normative modeling to learn an age-varying reference trajectory of structural connectomes from 1,164 neurotypical participants, then reports a global deviation score from brain-age difference and an individualized regional deviation map from regional embeddings. In 229 autistic children, the global score correlated with ADOS (Spearman R=−0.291) and IQ (Pearson R=0.195) in males, and brain-age prediction error was 3%–9% lower than comparable deep-learning models.

  3. arXiv

    Brain age from white matter fiber orientation: 3.54-year mean error across 692 people, and predictions rotate with the input

    Brain age prediction no longer relies only on diffusion tensor scalar metrics: white matter fiber orientation distributions (WM-FODs) enter directly as spherical harmonic coefficients, processed by an SE(3) equivariant CNN that preserves their transformation properties under rotation. On 692 participants aged 36-90 from the Human Connectome Project Aging dataset, this combined framework outperformed the evaluated DTI-based models and conventional CNNs; averaging five cross-validation models gave a mean absolute error of 3.54 years and a Pearson correlation of 0.958. The advantage depended on combining WM-FODs with equivariant processing, and accuracy was highest at maximum spherical harmonic order Lmax = 2.

  4. Retrained on Nigerian scans, a brain-age model reaches 9.82 years of error, then 8.78 on a second cohort

    Brain-age models trained mostly on Global North data lose accuracy when applied to Nigerian adults. A population-specific Gaussian process regression model trained on clinical T1-weighted MRI from 309 Nigerian adults reached a mean absolute error of 9.82 years on a 47-participant held-out test set without age-bias correction; on the 44-participant head-to-head set it reached 10.24 years, against 10.52 years for PyBrainAge, 12.33 for SynthBA, 17.51 for ENIGMA-Brain Age and 7.87 for SPARROW. After correction it reached 6.39 years internally but 8.78 years on a separate Nigerian cohort, where every model's R2 was negative.

You’re all caught up