Skip to main content
Search

# Latent Reasoning

9 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Agents learn to think in latent space: HybridAgent gains 10.4% on average across 11 benchmarks while cutting tokens by up to 54.7%

    HybridAgent lets a single agent move back and forth between continuous latent reasoning and text interaction within one generation, so part of its thinking leaves token-by-token decoding while tool use stays intact. Text agents previously had to write every step as tokens, while latent-reasoning models lacked native tool access and were hard to inspect. Across 11 benchmarks in mathematics, science, medicine, search and agentic reasoning at 4B to 14B scale, it reports a 10.4% average gain over frontier text and latent agents, with 35.5%–54.7% fewer tokens and 1.8–2.6 times faster inference.

  2. arXiv

    A decision model that loops its own layers eight times: 1.4B parameters close in on a single-pass model three times its size

    Typed decision models used to return option probabilities in a single forward pass, giving every decision a fixed amount of computation. SanSi turns a language model pre-trained to loop into a typed decision model, reading the option probabilities after every loop and training each with a proper scoring rule, so one model serves every budget from one loop to eight. On 10,027 test decisions from 59 sources it reaches 72.0% accuracy, 13.5 points above a non-looped model of the same shape trained with the same recipe and 1.8 points below a single-pass model with three times its parameters, at 7.7 times the GPU time of one pass.

  3. arXiv

    LLoCoT refines a compact latent workspace with a looped transformer, matching explicit-CoT accuracy on HumanEval and MBPP while cutting time to first answer token by about 36x

    The authors introduce LLoCoT, which replaces left-to-right latent generation with a few iterative refinement passes of a shared transformer over a compact latent workspace, then samples latent tokens in parallel from a probabilistic head to condition an autoregressive decoder; on HumanEval and MBPP it matches the accuracy of the explicit-CoT baseline Reasoning SFT and outperforms the base model, answer-only SFT and NF-CoT, while reducing time to the first answer token by about 36x, reasoning-phase latency by about 42x, and raising end-to-end throughput by 9.2%.

  4. arXiv

    Latent JEPA predicts future views via joint embedding, improving molecular optimization and editing and reaction metrics on ChemCoTBench

    The authors introduce Latent JEPA, a framework combining autoregressive learning with joint-embedding prediction of one or more future views, and develop textual and molecular prediction objectives for chemical reasoning so that continuous latent thoughts anticipate subsequent reasoning and molecular outcomes without verbalizing every intermediate step; on ChemCoTBench they report gains in molecular optimization and on several editing and reaction metrics, and representation analyses indicate that future prediction makes latent thoughts more informative about molecular outcomes and strengthens their correspondence with chemical structure.

  5. arXiv

    SynLat aligns compression boundaries to syntax and retains 94.0% of uncompressed accuracy at roughly 44% compression

    SynLat reframes chain-of-thought compression as a representation-fidelity allocation problem: constituency syntax partitions a trace into ordered, non-overlapping Syntax-Aligned Units (SAUs), an answer-conditioned Teacher builds progressive KEEP/LATENT targets for a single compression-conditioned Student, and latent units map to a shared discrete codebook, so at inference the Student generates mixed text-and-latent reasoning from only the question and requested compression level. Across two Qwen3 Student scales, Standard- and Long-CoT groups, and three compression levels, SynLat matches or exceeds the strongest evaluated baseline in all 12 task-group aggregates and strictly leads in 11, with overall gains of 3.6/2.6 points at MEDIUM and 7.0/5.5 points at HIGH.

  6. arXiv

    FLaRe reasons in a latent space with flow matching, beating prior latent methods on five probes and reaching 97% of explicit CoT accuracy at a quarter of the latency

    The authors define five requirements for latent reasoning (useful, diverse, explainable, refinable, efficient) and present Flow-based Latent Reasoning (FLaRe), a recipe built on flow matching in a learned latent space: train a VAE on symbolic CoTs, corrupt inputs and latent codes, train the flow mostly near pure noise, let the answer reader see both noised codes and the model's own predicted endpoints, and self-train on verified rollouts; probes show FLaRe improves on Coconut, CODI and PCCoT on all five requirements, compares favorably on arithmetic benchmarks, and reaches 97% of explicit CoT accuracy at about a quarter of its latency.

  7. arXiv

    AURAL reaches CoT-RL-comparable performance on speech language models with 11.8x faster time to first answer token via latent reasoning and joint chunk prediction

    The work introduces AURAL, which models a distribution over multiple plausible reasoning continuations in latent space and jointly predicts chunks of future states, and with AuralReason-683K (683K bilingual speech utterances, about 1,000 hours) for initial supervision plus AURAL-RL, it achieves performance comparable to CoT-RL across two backbones with larger gains over the respective supervised checkpoints on most metrics, and on Qwen2.5-Omni reduces time to the first answer token by 11.8x, from 1.22 to 0.10 s, versus 0.05 s for direct answering.

  8. arXiv

    TAPS adapts recurrent step size to the trajectory, lifting Sudoku accuracy to 91.39% and Maze to 79.90% while cutting the loops needed for matched quality

    The work introduces the Trajectory Adaptive Progress–Fluctuation Scheduler (TAPS), which uses exponential moving averages to estimate persistent progress and centered fluctuation in recurrent updates and adapts the per-step update scale online; it proves that under stated conditions TAPS reduces expected terminal loss and reaches a target quality in fewer loops, and empirically improves terminal accuracy with up to roughly 1.5x wall-clock speedup across Sudoku, Maze, language-model recurrence, and intermediate-layer recurrence.

  9. arXiv

    REST adds four differentiable losses to latent thoughts, lifting accuracy by up to 7.5 points across 7 benchmarks

    The work shows that training latent recursive LLM systems with only final-answer cross-entropy leaves the thought representation subject to four failures, and introduces REST, which turns causality, minimality, separability and stability into differentiable losses added to cross-entropy, improving accuracy over the CE-only baseline by an average of 3.5 points in the multi-agent setting and 3.3 in the single-agent setting, up to 7.5 and 6.5 points at best, and raising the rate of convergence on a final answer from 73% to 95%, across 7 benchmarks in mathematics, science, medicine and code generation under matched training data and latent budget.

You’re all caught up