Skip to main content
Search

# SkillsBench

3 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    APEX chains skills to carry a false user-approval record across handoffs, inducing attacker-selected actions in 74.2% of 690 SkillsBench attempts

    The work introduces APEX, which builds and refines adversarial skill chains tailored to a user task and an attacker-selected action: an upstream skill induces the agent to write a record of genuine task progress, and a downstream skill uses that record to carry a false claim of user approval, inducing the selected action in 512 of 690 attempts (74.2%) across four targeted-action families and six models on SkillsBench, with 84.3% success on GPT-5.4 versus 17.4% when the workflow is merged into one skill; a prompting defense lowers GPT-5.4 targeted-action success from 84.3% to 59.1% while the verifier test-pass rate across 72 benign native-skill tasks falls from 86.7% to 56.3%.

  2. arXiv

    SkillSeek matches an LLM-mediated retrieval loop on 89 SkillsBench tasks with BM25 plus a small reranker, cutting per-trial spend from USD 51.30 to USD 27.54

    The work presents SkillSeek, an open-source two-stage skill retriever (a BGE-base bi-encoder feeding a small cross-encoder, exposed over MCP), and across a grid of two skill pools and two backbones on the 89-task SkillsBench benchmark observes that plain bm25 alone records a pass rate at or above Liu et al.'s LLM-mediated loop on three of four settings, with a small cross-encoder covering the remaining difference on the fourth (34K pool with Qwen3.5) at the same 0.442, while total per-trial spend drops from USD 51.30 to USD 27.54 (within fifty cents of the USD 27.41 no-skill baseline), a pattern the authors attribute to a first-stage recall ceiling.

  3. arXiv

    SkillDRE evolves malicious agent skills through a dual-stage loop of pre-execution scanning and runtime feedback, reaching a 45.28% average attack success rate across four victim models on SkillsBench

    SkillDRE is a fully automated framework that, given a benign task and its associated skills, autonomously constructs and validates a task-conditioned malicious objective and a verifiable judge rule, then holds both fixed while alternating scanner-guided evolution with runtime-defense-guided refinement, forming a closed loop between the pre-execution and runtime stages; on SkillsBench across four victim models it achieves an average attack success rate of 45.28%, exceeding the strongest baseline by 40.3%, while its final submitted skills receive no SkillScan findings and largely preserve benign-task performance.

You’re all caught up