ControlScope compares three revision permissions from the same execution state: wider rewriting solves 2–3 more filesystem tasks but can also interrupt viable continuations
ControlScope compares three nested revision permissions from the same public execution state—continuing the current program (Keep), editing only the next tool call's data arguments (Arg), and replacing the unfinished workflow (Full)—evaluating one-time and repeated reviews across filesystem tasks, ALFWorld, and AppWorld, and finds that Full completes 15–16 of 20 filesystem tasks versus 13 for Keep across two source programs and three reasoning-reviewer draws, 10–13 versus 13 across four fast draws, scores 85/86/87 on 87 ALFWorld tasks and 134/134/127 on 134 tasks, shows small net differences on 585 AppWorld V1 official-test task instances, while frozen replays expose viable agent-written replacements interrupted by later revision.