Skip to main content
Search

# Model Collapse

4 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. Recursive training gets a thermostat: closed-loop control cuts collapse risk from 2.67 to 0.48 and keeps 97.4% of the tail

    Generative models retrained on their own output narrow their distribution and lose the tails first, and training pipelines have lacked a way to correct this while they run. HOMEOSTASIS fuses signed, hash-chained provenance records with three model vital signs, predictive entropy, calibration error and representational drift, into a Lyapunov-style collapse-risk score, and a PID controller adjusts the human-data mixing ratio and quarantine decisions. On a five-dimensional Gaussian recursion over 30 seeds and 20 generations, closed-loop control lowered final collapse risk from 2.67 to 0.48 and held tail coverage at 97.4% against 66.2% without control, while provenance-gated quarantine showed no detectable benefit beyond control alone.

  2. arXiv

    No Model Required: Text Entropy Rate Filtering Yields +42% Unique Trigrams, +30% Vocabulary, and -19% Repetition in Six-Generation QLoRA Iterative Fine-Tuning

    The work introduces a non-parametric Kontoyiannis entropy rate estimator h_k, computed entirely from raw text with no model of any kind, as a training-data filter; in a six-generation QLoRA collapse experiment on Llama-3.1-8B, h_k-filtering yields +42% unique trigrams, +30% vocabulary, and -19% repetition (all p<0.001), whereas logprob-based filtering provides no significant text-diversity benefit on any metric (p>0.23); h_k is further validated as a cross-domain entropy proxy (beta=0.924, R2=0.746) and collapse detector (rho=+0.454, p<0.0001) across 4 domains, 2 temperatures, 2 generator-scorer model pairs, and 1,520 generated documents.

  3. arXiv

    Re-bounding the Human-Data Ratio Needed to Prevent Model Collapse via Fisher-Rao Geometry

    This work models iterative generative-model training as a closed-loop stochastic process on the probability simplex and analyzes its dynamics under the Fisher-Rao metric instead of the Euclidean metric, deriving contraction and invariance bounds that remain meaningful as dimension grows and giving a human-to-synthetic data ratio threshold that guarantees convergence to a Fisher-Rao ball, concluding that the effective required human-data ratio is higher than previously implied.

  4. arXiv

    When AI Reviews Train AI Reviewers: Scientific-Judgment Collapse and Mitigation

    Starting from Llama 3.1 8B, the study first fine-tunes a reviewer on official ICLR reviews from 2018–2023, then trains four successor models on ICLR 2024 data with synthetic reviews generated by that reviewer mixed at 0%, 33%, 66%, and 100%, finding that higher synthetic exposure compresses rating distributions and monotonically reduces same-paper and corpus-level semantic diversity (about 11% and 5%), a pattern the authors call scientific-judgment collapse, and introduces TrustReviewer, which mitigates this tendency through training-time corpus curation and test-time paired activation steering.

You’re all caught up