Skip to main content
Search

Kyung Hee University

3 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. Nanoparticle safety stops being a material-only question: a host-response axis lifts biosafety AUC from 0.66 to 0.90

    Nanoparticle neurological safety is hard to predict from material properties alone, because exposure conditions, disease context and host responses reshape outcomes. Across 893 experimental contexts from 599 neurological studies, pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory/resolution and apoptosis-associated responses were harmonized into a Conserved Response Axis and added layer by layer to material descriptors. With a Random Forest model, biosafety ROC-AUC rose from 0.66 with material properties alone to 0.88 with exposure and biological context and 0.90 with cellular responses; recovery rose from 0.64 to 0.77 and 0.78.

  2. arXiv

    LADE extracts cross-model safety signals from first-token dark knowledge, lowering jailbreak success while preserving the safety-utility balance

    LADE extracts model-agnostic latent safety signals from dark knowledge in the first-token output probability distribution by contrasting harmful and benign queries, maps the selected tokens across tokenizers, and filters harmful queries via kNN distance before generation; across Llama-2-7B-Chat, Llama-3-8B-Instruct, Qwen2-7B-Instruct, Qwen3-8B, Gemma-7B-it, and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.3, it attains the lowest or near-lowest average compliance under multiple jailbreak attacks and the best safety-utility average on six of eight models.

  3. Interviews with 20 Korean nursing applicants and educators find AI competency assessments efficient but opaque in criteria and weak on nursing's human core

    Using a qualitative descriptive design with focus group interviews conducted in South Korea between February and August 2024, this study interviewed 10 nursing applicants with prior AI-based competency assessment (AICA) experience and 10 nurse educators (professors and nurse managers), and through conventional content analysis derived eight subthemes and four themes from 32 codes, finding that participants recognized AICA's efficiency and objectivity for large-scale recruitment while questioning opaque evaluation criteria, misalignment with person-centered nursing values, and fairness risks from network, lighting, device, and information-support gaps, and recommending nurse-specific algorithms, clear criteria, and positioning AI as a support to face-to-face interviews.

You’re all caught up