Answering belief questions is not collaborating: Claude recovers every agent belief but returns optimal plans in only 67.9% of matched cases
Theory-of-mind benchmarks usually ask story questions about what others believe, and a correct answer does not show the model can use that judgment in a task. This evaluation extends household collaboration and calendar scheduling with asymmetric information and separates world understanding, information access, beliefs, decisions and execution into independent interfaces. On matched scheduling cases Claude recovers all agent beliefs yet produces subjectively optimal plans in only 67.9% of cases, while supplying beliefs raises Qwen-27B household task success from 55.0% to 75.0%.