Strength criteria stop being hand-picked: a sparse differentiable search bakes convexity and uniqueness into the fit, cutting concrete's cross-validated error fourfold
Multiaxial strength tests give only a few dozen failure stress states, and choosing which limit surface to fit has long relied on manual comparison and visual checks. Researchers recast that choice as sparse model discovery with differentiable penalties, define the surface by the first root along rays so the equivalent stress is explicitly solvable, and add PBP atoms with learnable shape parameters plus competition-gated mixtures of experts. On concrete data the PBP model's cross-validated error is about a quarter of the monomial library's, and measured strength ratios are reproduced within a few per cent.