Skip to main content
Search

# KL-Regularized Reinforcement Learning

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    KL-regularized RL gets a sharp sample count: with a generative model, samples scale linearly in the effective horizon and temperature no longer slows learning

    KL-regularized reinforcement learning, the objective behind maximum-entropy RL and RL fine-tuning of language models from human feedback, previously had guarantees whose sample counts grew with a worse power of the effective horizon, and no MDP lower bound depended on the temperature. For tabular discounted MDPs with a generative model, this work shows that a plug-in estimator, which draws a fixed number of samples per state-action pair and solves the empirical MDP, reaches KL suboptimality at the temperature scale with samples linear in the effective horizon, and that no algorithm, even one choosing where to sample, can do with fewer.

  2. arXiv

    LSPD recasts on-policy distillation as KL-regularized RL: +1.59 Avg@16 across six math reasoning benchmarks, with a replay variant matching vanilla OPD in about a quarter of rollout batches

    The work reinterprets the reverse-KL objective of on-policy distillation (OPD) as KL-regularized policy optimization and introduces Least-Square Policy Distillation (LSPD), which replaces policy-gradient updates with robust quadratic log-probability matching plus entropy regularization, enabling multiple updates per rollout and reuse of historical trajectories; across six mathematical reasoning benchmarks and three teacher-student settings it improves Avg@16 by +1.59 and Pass@16 by +1.87 on average, and its fully off-policy replay variant LSPD-RB reaches performance comparable to vanilla OPD using roughly one quarter of the rollout batches.

You’re all caught up