Skip to main content
Search

# AI Agent Evaluation

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. Agents take on real physical-engineering projects: all 14 frontier models fall below 50% on PLE's private test set

    Google AI & Infrastructure, with Mercor, released Physical-Engineering's Last Exam (PLE), an 85-task benchmark and open competition spanning mechanical, electrical, civil and structural engineering that tests whether agents can complete real engineering work under a licensed engineer's review. Each task is a containerized project folder averaging 61 files, and an agent must find governing codes, run calculations and produce deliverables, earning points only after passing every hard safety check. On the private test set all 14 frontier models scored below 50%, with the top configuration reaching a mean of 48.3% on its native harness.

  2. arXiv

    BIABench tests AI agents on 16 published studies: routine analyses complete, but 3D and time-lapse tasks fall to 0.00–0.10

    The authors built BIABench, which reconstructs 16 published biological studies as end-to-end bioimage-analysis tasks giving the agent raw images plus a biologist's instruction, scores outcomes against the studies' own reported results with deterministic metrics and scores process with a VLM against expert-written rubrics, running six agents across several models and two instruction levels with three repeats each, and found routine 2D tasks reach up to 0.97 while 5D nuclear-pore quantification and 3D oncogenic puncta quantification stay at or below 0.25 in every configuration.

You’re all caught up