Skip to main content
Search

# Attention Steering

3 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Visual-head discovery scores shift with where attention is read: necessity tracks the query span, while steering at default strength is matched by random heads

    The internal choices inside a visual-head discovery score reshape which heads it returns in vision-language models. On Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct, fully crossing query type, discovery corpus and the token positions whose attention is read, and testing all 12 head-sets with steerability and necessity interventions, only necessity follows the attention source: query-span head-sets are more necessary than last-token ones, and the two referring plus query-span sets lie 17–19 standard deviations above 250 layer-matched random sets. At the default strength, no discovered head-set steers better than its layer-matched random sets.

  2. arXiv

    SAGE suppresses prompt-invariant visual attention sinks to improve grounding and reduce hallucination across VLM families

    Revisiting visual attention sinks in vision-language model decoders, this work finds a layer-dependent structure in which early and final decoder layers repeatedly collapse onto the same few image regions across prompts (Prompt-Invariant Sinks, PIS) while mid layers stay prompt-conditioned and drive vision-language alignment; it then proposes SAGE, a training-free intervention that applies an additive bias to visual-token attention logits using token-aligned ROI masks from standard vision backbones such as CLIP, ViT, and DINOv3, steering attention away from PIS toward query-relevant regions and improving visual grounding, reducing hallucination, and yielding gains on public benchmarks across LLaVA-1.5, Qwen2-VL, InternVL3, and NVILA.

  3. arXiv

    BaRe-Mem uses Bayesian reliability memory to shift a central model toward autonomous reasoning as advice turns misleading, and finds capable workers earlier on MuSiQue

    The work introduces BaRe-Mem, an online Bayesian reliability memory that estimates advisor reliability conditioned on the central model's internal belief representations, uses those estimates to modulate attention and to decide whether to consult; across nine benchmarks and six central models it is more robust to misleading advisor information than debate and majority voting, stays above autonomous reasoning on the more challenging tasks across all tested misleading levels, and in MuSiQue agent-team routing identifies capable workers earlier than routing by historical success counts.

You’re all caught up