# X-ray diffraction analysis

Periodic trained Periodic Neon on X-ray diffraction data from its own labs, reaching a 55.3% success rate on FrontierXRD, its hardest internal evaluation set, against an initial 2.7% for Kimi K2.6, the open-weight model it post-trained. The evaluation covers 134 samples from its labs that human experts take hours to resolve because of their complexity and ambiguity; Neon surpasses frontier models at a lower cost per analysis and is now deployed in its labs analyzing experiments in the search for better superconductors and magnets.

Periodic trained Periodic Neon on X-ray diffraction data from its own labs, reaching a 55.3% success rate on FrontierXRD, its hardest internal evaluation set, against an initial 2.7% for Kimi K2.6, the open-weight model it post-trained. The evaluation covers 134 samples from its labs that human experts take hours to resolve because of their complexity and ambiguity; Neon surpasses frontier models at a lower cost per analysis and is now deployed in its labs analyzing experiments in the search for better superconductors and magnets.