Skip to main content
Search

# agent trajectory

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Passing tests is not enough: structural scoring picks 1,024 agent trajectories and lifts SWE-Bench Verified pass@1 to 27.6%

    Supervised fine-tuning of coding agents no longer has to select only on whether the final patch passes the test suite: ranking trajectories by structure and keeping the top 1,024 raised pass@1 on SWE-Bench Verified from 24.8% for a random subset to 27.6%.

  2. arXiv

    Researchers formalize an 'intent-execution' gap and build SSA, reproducing or improving pass@1 on several agentic benchmarks and analyzing 154k trajectories to reveal behavioral differences across models

    The work formalizes AI agent performance as an 'intent-execution' gap (the mismatch between what a model intends and what the harness executes), introduces a customizable harness called Simple Strands Agent (SSA) to align different model families, reproduces or improves the pass@1 reported by diverse model-provider families on SWE-Pro, SWE-Verified, Terminal-Bench-2, and Deep-SWE, and, based on 154k trajectories generated by SSA, represents agent trajectories in code state-spaces to compute solution distance and backtracking, using finer-grained metrics such as edit frequency, testing activity, and phase-transitions to reveal differences in problem-solving behavior and effort allocation across frontier models whose pass@1 numbers are relatively even.

You’re all caught up