Skip to main content
Search

# pluralistic agents

1 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    AI agents deliberate on people's behalf: across 746 participants, they recovered 68% of the satisfaction gap between a single-model baseline and direct participation

    AI safety policy needs diverse input, yet the public cannot join every discussion. The work builds pluralistic agents: each AI agent first interviews the person it represents, then speaks for them in a multi-agent deliberation, while a policy-writer agent drafts and revises a budget after each round. In a preregistered study with 746 participants, people rated this process above giving input to a single reasoning model, recovering 68% of the satisfaction gap and 82% of the procedural-justice gap between that baseline and direct participation.

You’re all caught up