Skip to main content
Search

# Single-cell 3D Genome

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. bioRxiv

    Paired transcriptome and 3D genome from one cell: scHiR fuses two sparse modalities into a single cell embedding

    Technologies that simultaneously sequence single-cell transcriptome and 3D genome already yield paired measurements from the same cell, but the two modalities differ sharply in noise, scale and biological meaning, and were previously analyzed separately with latent spaces that need not align. scHiR maps gene expression and chromatin contact matrices into one hyperspherical latent space through modality-specific encoders and reconstructs both signals. On paired data from HiRES, GAGE-seq and LiMCA, the joint embedding matched or exceeded single-omics methods in clustering, and on mouse main olfactory epithelium it raised the Spearman correlation between pseudotime and developmental stage from 0.357 and 0.205 for single-omics embeddings to 0.517.

  2. Single-cell 3D genome boundaries survive sparse data: cross-cell alignment lets boundary strength split an embryo subpopulation RNA could not

    Single-cell 3D genome data are so sparse that domain boundaries are hard to call reliably, and positional disagreement across cells blocks comparison of boundary frequency and strength. CellRoB couples single-cell boundary detection with cross-cell alignment that minimizes an insulation-score loss, improving boundary accuracy and robustness to contact dropout on mouse brain Dip-C and human GM12878 scMicro-C data from 40 kb down to 5 kb. On multimodal mouse embryo data, boundary-strength profiles split the EPI cells that the RNA embedding left as one group.

You’re all caught up