Skip to main content
Search

# Smart Grid

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Tampering with only compromised sensors can still fool detectors: PCGAN reaches an 18.69% stealth-impact score on the IEEE 300-bus grid

    Working with write access to only a subset of deployed sensor channels and no knowledge of grid topology or detector parameters, PCGAN learns approximate active-power–angle and reactive-power–voltage-magnitude relations from historical measurements and uses adversarial training to generate data-injection perturbations that resemble normal operation. On the IEEE 300-bus system with one year of PJM hourly demand and 10% to 100% compromised sensors, it reaches 84.28% mean evasion of ten machine-learning detectors and 22.31% mean spatial load misperception, for an average stealth-impact score of 18.69% against 5.61% for the strongest competing attack.

  2. Three 100 MW-class battery storage case studies show frequency-regulation revenue and policy financing drive deployment, while thermal-runaway fires and missing standards hold it back

    Using a qualitative literature review plus multi-case comparison of three operating projects above 100 MW — Hornsdale Power Reserve (100 MW/129 MWh), Gateway Energy Storage (250 MW) and Victorian Big Battery (300 MW) — the study analyzes how battery energy storage systems (BESS) provide frequency regulation, peak shaving, renewable firming, voltage support and black start in smart grids, and identifies drivers such as public–private partnerships, FCAS and arbitrage revenue and green-bank financing, alongside barriers such as thermal-runaway fires, cooling-system failure, siting disputes, missing regulatory standards and high initial capital cost.

You’re all caught up