Constrained decoding is not the reasoning killer: with matched prompts, validity constraints gain up to 17.4%
Constrained decoding is often assumed to degrade LLM reasoning, but once the prompt and expected output format are aligned, causal ablations show the apparent gap comes mainly from prompt-level differences rather than decoder masking. The work splits constraints into format, validity and reasoning types and tests them across four model families and eleven open-source models; validity constraints, which remove invalid answers, give the most consistent gains, up to 17.4%, while reasoning constraints help only when the enforced trajectory is itself beneficial.