Skip to main content
Search

# AgentDojo

8 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    SecureGARD puts a semantic gate on tool calls: zero observed attack success across three benchmarks and two backbones

    Tool-using LLM agents turn model output into real actions, making indirect prompt injection an execution-security problem. SecureGARD inserts an executable ontology between planning and tool execution, grounding heterogeneous tool calls into shared semantic actions and judging each as ready, waiting, or forbidden against the current task state. Under benign and indirect-injection settings on AgentDojo, ASB, and AgentDyn, the observed attack success rate is 0% on both backbones, with higher task utility under attack than the compared baselines.

  2. Right tool, swapped argument: BiCP cuts confirmed injected attacks from 83/682 to 0/682 on a 922-case fixed replay

    Tool-using language-model agents can pick the intended tool yet execute an injected argument, and existing counterfactual guards lose source sensitivity when they score with a reasoning prefix that already encodes the injected decision. BiCP removes the current-step reasoning prefix before scoring, probes both the tool-name target and the complete-call target, and routes proposals by operation risk. On a 922-case fixed replay, the full method reduces confirmed InjecAgent attacks from 83/682 to 0/682 and unsafe conditional executions from 33/240 to 0/240, while benign task success rises from 66/120 to 78/120.

  3. arXiv

    Injection probes were reading the conversation, not the injection: matched negatives cut false alarms from 80% to 17%

    Linear injection probes could reach 0.91–0.98 AUROC on the standard evaluation using conversation position and text length alone; adding same-moment clean twins and harmless look-alikes to training cuts false alarms on injection-free conversations from 41–80% to 4–27% across six open models.

  4. arXiv

    Robustness tests for tool-using agents now check whether the task survived the edit: rescoring one trajectory set drops Mistral's attacked tasks from 64 to 26

    Robustness tests for tool-using agents can now check, before the agent runs, whether an edited test case still tests the same task; rescoring the same 14,336 stored trajectories under executable task contracts drops Mistral's attacked-task count from 64 to 26 under a MiniLM cosine threshold.

  5. arXiv

    A flipped bit no longer just ruins one generation: agents repair malformed calls, but output tokens rise 38%

    Injecting random two-bit weight faults into agent executions turns model-level corruption into system-level outcomes: agents recover from malformed tool calls and still finish tasks, yet faulted runs raise mean output tokens by 38.0%, and some faults shift security and alignment behavior.

  6. arXiv

    ASPIRE uses a behavior graph and dual explore-exploit experts to find agent prompt-injection vulnerabilities, reaching 54.1% attack success on AgentDojo

    ASPIRE is an open-ended prompt-injection red-teaming framework for LLM agents that maintains an evolving Agent Security Behavior Graph, uses complementary Explore and Exploit experts to propose consequence-centric test skeletons, has a separate realizer build concrete payloads and trigger queries, and updates the graph and cross-run strategy memory from trajectory evidence; on AgentDojo and AgentDyn it raises attack success to as high as 54.1% while covering more consequences, injection methods, environments, and behavior paths.

  7. arXiv

    The Same Zero: A VAL-Tier Framework Shows Identical ASR Hides Different Guarantees, as a VAL-Guided Stack Holds 0.000 Attack Success at 1.000 Benign Success

    The authors apply Verification Autonomy Levels (VAL, L0–L5) to 22 LLM-agent security defenses and run an equal-budget comparison of a VAL-guided stack (confirmation gate + schema sandbox) against a mainstream intuition stack (prompt hardening + keyword filter) across 50 scenarios, 12 attack variants, and adaptive/white-box/PAIR escalation, finding the VAL stack holds 0.000 attack success at 1.000 benign success while the intuition stack reaches 0.000 ASR but kills all benign actions, and that across testbeds of rising attack-surface hardness the intuition stack's zero drifts (0→1.9%→6.2%) while the VAL stack holds within its ODD (0→0→0), its only breach a disclosed out-of-ODD password gap (0.5%).

  8. arXiv

    Safety-routing evaluations distort under distribution shift: selection cost can match routing's entire benefit, and an attacker can cut judged recognition by 19.6 points

    The work sizes the selection cost of picking the best single model as comparator on the evaluation data in safety-routing benchmarks: 0.003-0.030 of harm under random splits and 0.045-0.113 under held-out categories on HELM Safety, comparable to the whole deficit attributed to routing, rising seven- to ninefold on AgentDojo when suites are held out; scored honestly under shift, routing buys little, and an attacker who knows which model it faces lowers GPT-5.4's judged recognition by 19.6 points.

You’re all caught up