Skip to main content
Search

# ALIGNN

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. Calibrated uncertainty often fails to beat random sampling: active learning on out-of-distribution materials data

    Active learning for materials and molecular property prediction treats high-uncertainty samples as the information a model is missing. Across formation energy, bandgap and solubility tasks, uncertainty came from loss-landscape sampling and from ensembles retrained with different seeds, then was calibrated with linear calibration factors and a neural network. Calibrated uncertainty generally did not reduce the data a model needed to improve on out-of-distribution data, showing no advantage over random sampling or uncalibrated estimates, and error bars overlapped.

  2. Screening 2.8 million ordered metals for conductivity: machine learning ranks, electron-phonon calculations check

    Computing metallic conductivity from first principles is expensive, so large chemical spaces have gone largely unscreened. This workflow ranks about 2.8 million ordered compounds using two machine-learning proxies, a BoltzTraP2 conductivity under the constant relaxation-time approximation and the Eliashberg electron-phonon coupling λ, combined by symbolic regression into σSR=0.4σBT/λ, then runs full electron-phonon transport on the candidates. Be2IrPt, H3NaNi, LuIr and LiBePt2 reach room-temperature conductivities of roughly 34 to 38×106 S/m, comparable to aluminum's 36.59×106 S/m but still below Ag, Au and Cu.

You’re all caught up