Skip to main content
Search

# Emergent Misalignment

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Suppressed misbehavior in language models can come back: PEARL trains from half-failed trajectories and holds under retraining

    Undesired behaviors in language models can re-emerge during later fine-tuning, and standard post-hoc suppression had not been compared on immediacy, durability and capability together. PEARL adds adversarial prefixes, continuations from intermediate states of cached misaligned trajectories, to GRPO's on-policy rollouts so the policy practices recovering from partly wrong states. Across Qwen3-4B and GPT-OSS-20B and two organism types, PEARL suppresses strongly while preserving task accuracy, with the clearest gains on the broad-trigger organism and GPT-OSS-20B; on Qwen3-4B with the narrow-trigger organism, SFT is more durable under heavy targeted retraining.

  2. arXiv

    Tracking fine-tuning trajectories shows safety-aligned LLMs are not steered toward harm but lose their safe subspace, and projecting out the harmful gradient subspace cuts free-generation emergent misalignment by up to 80.0% on Qwen2.5-14B-IT

    The work presents a dynamic second-order geometric study of emergent misalignment (EM): tracking training trajectories shows directional Hessian curvature concentrates on semantic pivot tokens, Grassmannian projections show the harmful-safe gap widens mainly because safe-gradient overlap declines rather than through rotation toward a new malicious circuit, and on this basis it introduces a parameter-level Geometric Mitigation Framework that orthogonally projects the empirical harmful gradient subspace out of LoRA updates, suppressing free-generation EM by up to 80.0% on Qwen2.5-14B-IT and, across four open-weight instruction-based model families (3B–20B), teacher-forced evaluation shows the same harmful subspace controls the conditional support of frozen EM responses.

You’re all caught up