Skip to main content
Search

# Neural Posterior Estimation

6 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    DINGO-TGR cuts a six-parameter gravity test to 38 minutes, and 1,000 noise injections find GW150914's offset unremarkable

    DINGO-TGR infers binary parameters and six post-Newtonian phase-deformation parameters jointly with neural posterior estimation, then reweights the network's approximate posterior by importance sampling. For GW150914 the inference takes about 38 minutes against roughly 177 hours for bilby-tgr with dynesty, and about 4.4 hours against 238 hours for the higher signal-to-noise GW250114. GW150914 shows a mild offset from general relativity in the leading principal-component mode, but 115 of 1,000 general-relativity injections resembling GW150914 reach or exceed that offset, an empirical upper-tail p-value of about 0.115 that does not reject the general-relativity null at the 5% level.

  2. arXiv

    Galaxy morphology as a fossil record: Katachi-PRIME infers mass, age and metallicity from three-band images

    Katachi-PRIME (形') feeds three-band gri galaxy images together with photometry into implicit likelihood inference to return full posteriors for stellar mass, specific star formation rate, redshift, age, dust attenuation and gas-phase metallicity. On roughly 232,000 GSWLC galaxies, image-only posteriors are tighter than those from 5-band photometry and combining both is best; the same image embeddings show that main-sequence and quiescent morphologies retain star formation history continuously for several Gyr, while starbursts and green-valley galaxies keep only the most recent activity.

  3. arXiv

    Bacterial genome hotspots no longer rest on a few summary statistics: neural posterior estimation separates recombination from mutation rates and assigns hotspot probabilities

    Recombination and mutation rates vary along bacterial genomes, the two signals overlap, and clonal relationships confound inference, while earlier methods often assumed a constant mutation rate or relied on a small set of summary statistics. This work trains a simulator-based neural posterior estimator conditioned on a fixed clonal genealogy to infer local recombination and mutation rates for each gene segment, then applies a circular posterior-propagated Difference-of-Gaussians detector that carries posterior uncertainty into hotspot calls. On simulated data the inferred rates track the true values and credible intervals narrow as gene length grows; candidate hotspots are reported for three real datasets in the Bacillus cereus group, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.

  4. arXiv

    EMRI parameter inference no longer needs a true-value start: a neural network narrows the search, and a six-month signal yields posteriors in about ten hours

    Bayesian parameter inference for extreme-mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs) has relied on narrow priors centered on the true parameters or Markov chains initialized near them, information real observations do not provide. A deep-learning-assisted framework first uses a neural network to produce approximate posteriors from the data and shrink the search region, then particle swarm optimization finds a high-likelihood starting point, and staged Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling produces the final posteriors. On two noise-free six-month simulated signals, the resulting posteriors agree closely with reference analyses initialized near the true values, and once the network is trained each signal takes about ten hours.

  5. arXiv

    Chemical reaction networks stop refitting per dataset: one training run, then model choice and rate constants in seconds

    A single amortized neural architecture now handles reaction-pathway discrimination and rate-constant estimation together, so new experimental data needs only a forward pass to yield posterior model probabilities and parameter posteriors.

  6. A calibrated flu posterior can still pick the wrong antiviral tier: a diagnostic scores decisions, not parameters

    Seasonal influenza models are routinely asked to recommend an antiviral coverage tier from weekly reported cases, yet a well-calibrated parameter posterior does not make that tier identifiable. A decision-relevance score weighted by the variance of the decision margin measures how much of that variance comes from directions the data failed to shrink; on a 192-cell synthetic grid the bounded posterior still flipped the plug-in action in 26.7% of cells, and the plug-in rule lost 11.7% of the oracle's value. On 204 real FluView region-seasons, widening the reporting-rate prior raised the main arm from 0.476 to 0.733 while the scale-invariant control stayed near zero.

You’re all caught up