Skip to main content
Search

# Adversarial Perturbation

3 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Changing only 5% of pixels blocks face cloning: SEAL holds identity similarity to 0.15 or less on CelebA-HQ and VGGFace2

    Adversarial perturbations added to photos can stop a diffusion model from learning a person's identity, but earlier methods altered the whole face densely, and the accumulated distortion became visible around facial features. SEAL confines the perturbation to 5% of spatial locations, jointly optimizing where it lands and its values with a differentiable top-k mask, and disrupts the latent variance of a frozen VAE encoder. On CelebA-HQ and VGGFace2, protected images reach above 41 dB PSNR, 0.97 SSIM and at most 0.07 LPIPS, while identity similarity after DreamBooth personalization stays at most 0.15.

  2. arXiv

    Qwen2.5-VL-7B shows a train/inference gap on 200 COCO images: target-token rank is fixed at 3,488 per step, and the language decoder, not the visual encoder, decides whether the attack lands

    Using a controlled two-stage PGD attack on 200 held-out COCO images with Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, the authors show that a targeted perturbation can drive teacher-forced training loss for a fixed target caption to near zero while free generation still produces the original correct description, localize this train/inference gap to a single autoregressive step (target-token rank fixed at exactly 3,488 of 152,064 vocabulary entries with zero variance), and trace all 28 decoder layers to show the visual encoder corrupts every image by a comparable margin while the language decoder amplifies the corrupted signal for susceptible images and actively suppresses it for resistant ones (p<0.001, rank-biserial r=0.579).

  3. arXiv

    Within an ε≤4/255 perturbation budget, targeted semantic substitution makes vision-language models name the target, confirm its presence, and deny the source, reaching 38% complete replacement on images and 35.9% on video

    Under a white-box threat model, the work aligns each stream of a source image with its counterpart in a target image in the victim vision-language model's post-merger token space and evaluates under a strict success criterion requiring the model to simultaneously name the target, confirm its presence, and deny the source, finding that target semantics appear at ε=2/255 and complete replacement reaches 38% at ε=4/255 on images and 35.9% at ε=1/255 on video, while also observing semantic fusion.

You’re all caught up