Skip to main content
Search

# Hallucination Detection

5 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    CheXPoT checks chest X-ray reports after generation: MedGemma-4B micro-average precision rises from 19.2% to 46.8%

    Chest X-ray vision-language models can write fluent reports that nonetheless assert findings absent from the image, and earlier fixes mostly retrained the generator through reinforcement learning, preference optimization or chain-of-thought supervision. CheXPoT instead works after generation: it decomposes a report into checkable predicates, tests each against a visual evidence table built from a chest X-ray classifier and Grad-CAM locations, and rewrites the report after removing predicates the image cannot support. On a 4,145-image held-out split, MedGemma-4B reports moved from 19.2% to 46.8% micro-average precision and from 23.0% to 49.4% micro-average F1, with significant precision gains on 8 of 14 CheXpert classes and no significant decreases in precision or F1.

  2. arXiv

    LLMs quietly flip constraints when they write optimization models: post-hoc repair lifts zero-shot accuracy from 44.8% to 64.9% without retraining the generator

    OPT-Kraken treats an LLM's optimization model and solver code as frozen artifacts and repairs them after the fact, lifting zero-shot accuracy from 44.8% to 64.9% across six benchmarks while making only 0.6% of initially correct outputs incorrect.

  3. arXiv

    Researchers propose a cross-model hidden-state probing framework in which an external observer can match or exceed a generator's self-detection of its own hallucination onsets

    The work introduces an internal hidden-state framework for fine-grained, span-level hallucination detection that inspects layer-wise activation patterns to locate the onset and continuation tokens of hallucinations in large language model generations; experiments show substantial improvements in Precision-Recall AUC over random baselines despite extreme class imbalance, and it further proposes a cross-model detection framework in which one model observes the internal representations elicited by another model's generation, finding that an external observer can match or exceed the generator's self-detection of its own hallucination onsets, including when the observer is the smaller model.

  4. arXiv

    Adapting LUH uncertainty heads to Persian medical models yields single-pass claim-level hallucination detection with PR-AUCs of 0.4820 and 0.4652

    The study adapts the LLM Uncertainty Head framework to two Persian medical models built on Aya-Expanse-8B, Gaokerena-V and Gaokerena-R; it first observes on a 168-question Iranian medical entrance examination that Gaokerena-V has substantially lower five-run consistency than Aya-Expanse-8B while Gaokerena-R is comparable, then builds Persian claim-level hallucination datasets with 1,600 responses per backbone and trains lightweight claim-level heads on frozen backbone attention maps and token probabilities, obtaining held-out PR-AUCs of 0.4820 and 0.4652 (2.30 and 2.66 times their random baselines) and ROC-AUCs of 0.7852 and 0.7810, with no retrieval or repeated sampling at inference.

  5. JMIR AI

    Retrieve-Then-Verify for Evaluating Evidence Support and Hallucination in Large Language Model-Generated Medical Information

    This study evaluated three large language models (GPT-5, OpenAI o3-mini, and GPT-3.5) on risk-of-bias (RoB 2) assessment across 97 randomized controlled trials, retrieving relevant passages from trial reports with Okapi BM25 and then assigning each generated claim an evidence verdict of supported, contradicted, not found, or out of scope with verbatim quotations; binary accuracy of AI-generated judgments was high (90%-98%), yet evidence support rates were only 60%-65% with conservative hallucination rates of 34%-37%, showing that high decision-level accuracy does not guarantee documentary support.

You’re all caught up