Skip to main content
Search

# Knowledge Augmentation

3 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. Yidu Tech releases TCM evidence agent Xiaohuangqi: answers traceable sentence by sentence, 8,000+ terms translated

    At the 2026 World Conference on Traditional Medicine, Yidu Tech released Xiaohuangqi, a traditional Chinese medicine evidence agent that supports classic-text search, guideline and literature tracing, syndrome differentiation assistance, formula lookup and terminology translation. TCM knowledge is complex, terminologically distinctive and spread across many sources, so the system grounds answers in evidence and traces each sentence to its source to reduce the risk of AI hallucination. Its knowledge base draws on People's Medical Publishing House TCM knowledge and more than 8,000 international TCM terms; Yidu ZhiXun and the Yidu clinical assistant are reported in use at more than 40 well-known hospitals nationwide.

  2. arXiv

    Weakly annotated bioimages get domain knowledge: seven model families improve at once

    Automated feature extraction from weakly annotated bioimaging data performs inconsistently across datasets because models depend on the images alone. A model-agnostic knowledge augmentation method lets machine learning models exploit domain knowledge beyond automated feature extraction, improving classification across seven architectures; combined with masked autoencoder self-supervised learning it raises precision by 2.9% over the next-best method on three in-house microscopy datasets and by 6.8% on average across three public cytomorphology benchmarks.

  3. Locally Deployed Large Language Models for AI-Assisted Outpatient Prescription Review: Crossover Study

    This study deployed the open-source Qwen3-14B model on a hospital intranet server using the Ollama framework, supported it with lightweight knowledge augmentation through exact-match injection from a structured knowledge base derived from drug package inserts, and used a 2-period crossover design in which 2 pharmacists independently reviewed the same 213 outpatient prescriptions under unaided and AI-assisted conditions; human-AI collaborative review achieved 97.2% (207/213) accuracy versus 82.6% (176/213) for pharmacist-alone review, sensitivity was 98% (61/62) versus 55% (34/62), the false-negative rate fell from 45% to 2%, knowledge augmentation reduced the model hallucination rate from 19.7% (42/213) to 4.7% (10/213), mean per-prescription review time fell from 2.33 to 1.

You’re all caught up