Skip to main content
Search

Yu Li

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    CITA trains a comparative inference model with a Bayesian tool-graph simulator and LLM comparison judgments, consistently improving Tool F1 and task success across three tool-use benchmarks and multiple backbone LLMs

    The work proposes Comparative Inference for Tool-use Agents (CITA), which trains a Comparative Inference Model (CIM) from paired signals combining observed tool behavior, scalable supervision from a Bayesian tool-graph simulator, and semantic judgments from LLM-based comparison, so that the model estimates how likely a possible next tool invocation is to support final task success under the current context; across three tool-use benchmarks and multiple backbone LLMs, CITA consistently improves Tool F1 and task success, and additional analysis shows CIM learns accurate step-level value estimates for comparative tool choices.

  2. arXiv

    CIPO trains LLM agents with counterfactual branches to adaptively pick tool granularity, raising success and decision compression across three benchmarks and two backbones

    The work proposes CIPO: it first mines executable composite skills from successful tool-use trajectories via budget-constrained BPE-style merging, then augments GRPO by branching at the first eligible granularity decision of each base rollout and using the paired outcome difference as a bounded supplementary reward; across TOOLATHLON, TOUCAN, and TRAJECT-Bench with Qwen2.5-7B and Llama3.1-8B, CIPO attains the highest Tool F1 and TSR in all six settings with an average Comp./Raw of 0.845 versus 0.912 for GRPO + Skills, and the gain does not come from simply invoking skills more often.

You’re all caught up