Skip to main content
Search

Iowa State University

2 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. arXiv

    Nine AI agents wrote 135 research follow-ups, and none cleared the domain scientists' bar on integrity, completeness and sufficiency

    Scientists at US Department of Energy national laboratories set the conditions an unpublished follow-up direction must meet, and nine frontier AI agents each wrote 15 follow-up papers, 135 in total. None passed all three checks of integrity, completeness and sufficiency, and 114 failed the integrity check, most often by claiming work that was never done or reporting numbers that contradict the recorded evidence. Agents readily produce papers that look like follow-ups, but none meets the standard the domain scientist set.

  2. arXiv

    CyTReX turns DNP3 anomaly alerts into traceable ranked threat hypotheses, with a five-configuration comparison showing the complete pipeline gives the richest evidence but weaker label anchoring

    The paper presents CyTReX, an explainable threat reasoning framework for distributed energy resource (DER) networks that consolidates edge anomaly detection evidence, cloud attack interpretation, SHAP feature attributions, surrogate decision rules, and MCP-enabled cyber threat intelligence into a unified evidence packet that constrains large language model reasoning to produce ranked threat hypotheses and attack trees; across five configurations on a DNP3 case study, adding reasoning components improved hypothesis specificity, evidence traceability, and analytical grounding, with the complete pipeline providing the richest evidence-grounded reasoning context.

You’re all caught up