Skip to main content
Search

Politecnico di Torino

4 related articles

Subscribe to updates
  1. Federated learning screens clients before round one: one wavelet summary each, training survives 90% malicious

    Federated learning can screen out poisoned clients before the first round: each client sends a single wavelet scattering summary, and a denoising autoencoder trained only on clean data scores them, keeping training alive when 90% of clients are malicious.

  2. arXiv

    GROB's multi-agent architecture captured Census identifiers on 9 September from public traces alone, later resolved by public revision records to specific 16–17 June Census requests

    GROB is a multi-agent architecture that performs controlled, read-only collection of public Internet traces when privileged telemetry is unavailable and preserves observations for later resolution; in a frozen September 2026 corpus, Census identifiers captured on 9 September were later resolved by public revision records to specific read-only Census requests from 16–17 June, while other traces showed links of varying strength and public traces alone did not establish organizational attribution.

  3. F1000Research

    Review of 86 MRI-based autism AI studies: single-site accuracy reaches 99%, but leave-one-site-out validation lands near 67%

    Following PRISMA, this review searched Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed for 2015–2026 studies and included 86 Q1 journal articles, systematically mapping MRI-based machine learning and deep learning studies for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) classification across datasets, preprocessing pipelines, brain atlases, model architectures, and validation strategies; it finds fMRI is the most used modality with graph neural networks and transformers as dominant trends, and shows reported accuracy depends heavily on evaluation setup—single-site studies reach 87.4%–99.39%, the full ABIDE cohort sits around 70%–75%, and the strictest leave-one-site-out testing lands near 67%.

  4. The Unbearable Lightness of Prompting: A Critical Reflection on the Environmental Impact of genAI use in Design Education

    Using a 2023 workshop with 49 students as a motivating example, this paper critically reflects on the energy costs of using genAI in design education and develops a set of five alternative stances, with related actions, to support the conscious use of genAI in design education.

You’re all caught up