Skip to main content
Back to timeline
arXivSource publication:

Pixel diffusion drops attention mixing: Volterra layers beat JiT's FID at every ImageNet scale

Synopsis

Pixel-space diffusion models had inherited softmax attention from sequence modeling as their token mixer, although the optimal denoiser under Gaussian noise admits a polynomial functional expansion in the observation. PoD compresses each image patch through a low-dimensional bottleneck and stacks cascaded low-rank Volterra layers that mix tokens and channels, with no activation function on the residual path. At matched parameters and FLOPs on ImageNet, PoD beats JiT in FID at every scale, with the largest gap at the G scale.

Source-provided article image: Polynomial Denoisers on the Image Manifold: Volterra Networks for Self-Contained Pixel Diffusion
arXiv

Interpretation

The mixing operator in pixel-space diffusion becomes a Volterra layer, so the residual path carries no activation function and the model uses no attention, no convolution and no pretrained components. Earlier self-contained pixel diffusion kept softmax attention, inherited from sequence modeling, as the mixing operator and changed only the prediction target to the clean image plus an aggressive per-patch bottleneck. At matched parameters and FLOPs on ImageNet, PoD has lower FID than JiT at every scale, with the largest gap at the G scale; the ordering holds at the 32×32 patch setting too, where PoD-G/32 has lower FID than JiT-G/32.

Each raw patch first passes through a low-rank linear map into a bottleneck dimension, then through stacked alternating cross-token and channel mixers that form the polynomial denoiser. The low-rank Volterra primitive replaces a dense high-order kernel with a project–multiply–mix operation, multiplying two projected groups elementwise and mixing the products back, at lower cost than a dense kernel. In a controlled one-dimensional spiral embedded in adjustable ambient dimension, the Volterra block under clean-image prediction attains the lowest mean distance to the manifold, roughly two to five times lower than the MLP and attention.

Perspective

The results cover class-conditional ImageNet-1K generation at 16×16 and 32×32 patch settings and four model scales matched in parameters and FLOPs; the controlled manifold experiment uses only a one-dimensional spiral embedded in an adjustable ambient dimension.

The analysis assumes the data are supported exactly on a smooth compact manifold, whereas real image distributions only concentrate near one; the worst-case compression term can grow with the ambient dimension; and a slower rate for attention at matched budget remains a conjecture rather than a theorem.