Public articles linked to the same research event.
发表出处待核验 In the context of family caregivers of people living with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD), this work compares caregiver support exchanges from online communities with peer-like responses prompted from three LLMs (LLaMA, GPT-4o-mini, and MedGemma), using psycholinguistic and qualitative analysis to show that peer responses used significantly more first-person and past-focused language than peer-like AI responses, identifies seven types of personal narratives in human peer support, and finds that AI often captures their emotional work while potentially fabricating experiential grounding, thereby naming a narrative authenticity gap and a synthetic lived experience paradox.
In the context of family caregivers of people living with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD), this work compares caregiver support exchanges from online communities with peer-like responses prompted from three LLMs (LLaMA, GPT-4o-mini, and MedGemma), using psycholinguistic and qualitative analysis to show that peer responses used significantly more first-person and past-focused language than peer-like AI responses, identifies seven types of personal narratives in human peer support, and finds that AI often captures their emotional work while potentially fabricating experiential grounding, thereby naming a narrative authenticity gap and a synthetic lived experience paradox.
In the context of family caregivers of people living with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD), this work compares caregiver support exchanges from online communities with peer-like responses prompted from three LLMs (LLaMA, GPT-4o-mini, and MedGemma), using psycholinguistic and qualitative analysis to show that peer responses used significantly more first-person and past-focused language than peer-like AI responses, identifies seven types of personal narratives in human peer support, and finds that AI often captures their emotional work while potentially fabricating experiential grounding, thereby naming a narrative authenticity gap and a synthetic lived experience paradox.
In the context of family caregivers of people living with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD), this work compares caregiver support exchanges from online communities with peer-like responses prompted from three LLMs (LLaMA, GPT-4o-mini, and MedGemma), using psycholinguistic and qualitative analysis to show that peer responses used significantly more first-person and past-focused language than peer-like AI responses, identifies seven types of personal narratives in human peer support, and finds that AI often captures their emotional work while potentially fabricating experiential grounding, thereby naming a narrative authenticity gap and a synthetic lived experience paradox.